From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751323AbVJFTXw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:23:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751324AbVJFTXw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:23:52 -0400 Received: from prosun.first.fraunhofer.de ([194.95.168.2]:25481 "EHLO prosun.first.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751323AbVJFTXv (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:23:51 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:23:48 +0200 From: Soeren Sonnenburg Message-ID: Organization: Local Intranet News MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Subject: orinoco vs. waproamd ? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I used to use orinoco-cvs from april 2005 together with waproamd and kernel 2.6.11/12 without any trouble. However since 2.6.13 and also in 2.6.14-rc{2,3} waproamd first puts up the interface and initializes it correctly and then somehow gets confused with ssid's and sets only a part of it, e.g. instead of 'iamanssid': 'anssid' wich of course kills the connection and then the process seems to go on and on... does anyone have an idea whether this is a kernel bug or one in waproamd ? (this is on a pbook 15" 1GHz btw) Soeren.