From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750742AbWFMTCM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:02:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750799AbWFMTCM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:02:12 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:29344 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742AbWFMTCL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:02:11 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Steve Fox Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:01:50 -0500 Organization: IBM Message-ID: References: <20060609214024.2f7dd72c.akpm@osdl.org> <20060613065443.7f302319.akpm@osdl.org> <448EC74F.30104@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 68-115-104-43.dhcp.roch.mn.charter.com User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:10:23 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Frankly speaking, I don't see how that can be possible. I haven't touched > any *real* checks in ide_allocate_dma_engine(), so it should fail regardless > of my patch. I'd rather supposed that pci_alloc_consistent() had failed... It appears that Sergei may be correct. I get the same failure with that one patch reverted. -- Steve Fox IBM Linux Technology Center