From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758034AbZBNXQt (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:16:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755612AbZBNXH6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:07:58 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:44634 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755590AbZBNXH4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:07:56 -0500 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Valentin QUEQUET" References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #12680] Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt. To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:38:22 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680 Subject : Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt. Submitter : Valentin QUEQUET Date : 2009-02-09 09:12 (6 days old)