From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Licensing & copyright of kernel .config files (defconfig, *config)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 01:43:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <robbat2-20140601T012929-356267352Z@orbis-terrarum.net> (raw)
(Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
Hi,
Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
have a copyright header on them...
For a kernel .config file, either from one of the defconfig or any other
*config option that automates the answer:
1. What license does the file fall under?
2. Who are the copyright holders?
Naively, since the defconfigs are bundled with the kernel, that could
fall under GPLv2-only implicitly, but lacking any explicit copyright
headers makes this interesting (arch/*/configs/* contain lots of files,
no copyright headers on them).
If I manually write the names of some configuration options to a new
.config file, at that point I logically am the only author and have
copyright of it. My editor slaps a default license on it of BSD-2.
Thereafter I run olddefconfig, and now it's a combined work of the
kernel's defconfig and my manual settings. If GPL-2 was inherited from
the kernel tree, this is now a combined BSD-GPL2 work, or is it? The
kernel config tools did consider my file as input, possibly overrode the
settings if they didn't work with others, and re-output everything.
If the files are to be marked with a copyright header, who is the holder
of it that it should be attributed to?
Alternatively, is this a case where the work is not copyrightable, and
the files should have a notice to that effect?
Background:
Gentoo has a bunch of "stock" kernel configurations for release
engineering, our initramfs tool (genkernel), and other endeavors over
the years. These projects claim BSD, GPL2, LGPL2 on various pieces, and
I don't think they can all be correct. I'm working on getting them into
one place, because some of them have been getting stale, but the
differing licenses raised a red flag to me.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-01 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-01 1:43 Robin H. Johnson [this message]
2014-06-01 1:52 ` David Lang
2014-06-01 23:01 ` Ken Moffat
2014-06-01 23:29 ` Robin H. Johnson
2014-06-02 4:18 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=robbat2-20140601T012929-356267352Z@orbis-terrarum.net \
--to=robbat2@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®