mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Moritz Franosch <jfranosc@physik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli),
	marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IO performance problems in 2.4.19-pre5 when writing to DVD-RAM/ZIP/MO
Date: 17 Apr 2002 17:47:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <rxxbscitjhs.fsf@synapse.t30.physik.tu-muenchen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16xVW9-0000Fq-00@the-village.bc.nu>


Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> > > benchmarks 1-4, kernel 2.4.19-pre5 performed much worse than
> > > 2.4.18. The reason may be that the main throughput stems from the
> > > short moments where, for what reason whatsoever, read speed increases
> 
> Fairness, throughput, latency - pick any two..  

That's exactly the point. Writing large files to DVD-RAM leads to low
throughput when reading from HDD, long latencies and doesn't even
let the HDD read as mush data as is written to DVD-RAM (with 2.4.18),
which is very unfair.

My benchmarks show bad throughput. What I first observed was bad
latency when writing to DVD-RAM (no mouse movement for 3 seconds or
so, long times switching between applications, text output delayed
when typing). Fairness shouldn't be an issue because 2.4.18/19-pre5
are also bad when both tested disks are on different IDE controllers,
therefore no resources must be shared between the reading and the
writing process (except RAM for cache, but there is plenty).

Moritz


-- 
Dipl.-Phys. Moritz Franosch
http://Franosch.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-17 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <rxxadshj1rh.fsf@synapse.t30.physik.tu-muenchen.de>
2002-04-16 14:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-16 15:39   ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 16:25     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-17 15:35     ` Moritz Franosch
2002-04-16 16:09   ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 16:40     ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 16:41     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-17 15:47     ` Moritz Franosch [this message]
2002-04-16 19:14   ` Roger Larsson
2002-04-17 19:12     ` Moritz Franosch
2002-04-17 15:26   ` Moritz Franosch
2002-04-17 16:34     ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-17 17:32     ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=rxxbscitjhs.fsf@synapse.t30.physik.tu-muenchen.de \
    --to=jfranosc@physik.tu-muenchen.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®