From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org,
Linux filesystem caching discussion list
<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h3a86ziko.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3776.1249406624@redhat.com>
At Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:23:44 +0100,
David Howells wrote:
>
>
> Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > =======================================================
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.30-test #7
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (&cwq->lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01519f3>] __queue_work+0x1f/0x4e
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (&q->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c012cc9c>] __wake_up+0x26/0x5c
> >
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > ...
>
> Can you try the attached patch from Peter Zijlstra? It should cause the work
> queue's waitqueue spinlock to have a separate lockdep class from the page
> bit's waitqueue.
I'm willing to test it, but could you clarify which patches to be
tested together with this one? There are a few flying around...
thanks,
Takashi
>
> David
> ---
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] Give waitqueue spinlocks their own lockdep classes
>
> Give waitqueue spinlocks their own lockdep classes when they are initialised
> from init_waitqueue_head(). This means that struct wait_queue::func functions
> can operate other waitqueues.
>
> This is used by CacheFiles to catch the page from a backing fs being unlocked
> and to wake up another thread to take a copy of it.
> ---
>
> include/linux/wait.h | 9 ++++++++-
> kernel/wait.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
> index 6788e1a..cf3c2f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wait.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wait.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,14 @@ struct task_struct;
> #define __WAIT_BIT_KEY_INITIALIZER(word, bit) \
> { .flags = word, .bit_nr = bit, }
>
> -extern void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q);
> +extern void __init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q, struct lock_class_key *);
> +
> +#define init_waitqueue_head(q) \
> + do { \
> + static struct lock_class_key __key; \
> + \
> + __init_waitqueue_head((q), &__key); \
> + } while (0)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> # define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) \
> diff --git a/kernel/wait.c b/kernel/wait.c
> index ea7c3b4..c4bd3d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/wait.c
> @@ -10,13 +10,14 @@
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/hash.h>
>
> -void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q)
> +void __init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q, struct lock_class_key *key)
> {
> spin_lock_init(&q->lock);
> + lockdep_set_class(&q->lock, key);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->task_list);
> }
>
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_waitqueue_head);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__init_waitqueue_head);
>
> void add_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
> {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 2:37 Christian Kujau
2009-06-22 8:58 ` [Linux-cachefs] " David Howells
2009-06-22 14:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 7:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 13:00 ` David Howells
2009-07-07 13:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-22 15:21 ` David Howells
2009-06-22 15:45 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-23 0:36 ` Christian Kujau
2009-06-23 7:49 ` Christian Kujau
2009-07-27 14:37 ` Incorrect circular locking dependency? David Howells
2009-08-04 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-04 15:50 ` David Howells
2009-08-04 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 17:23 ` [Linux-cachefs] CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file David Howells
2009-08-05 10:00 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2009-08-07 12:07 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 14:26 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5h3a86ziko.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome