Re: 2.6.17rc emu10k1 regression.

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

At Mon, 29 May 2006 10:50:31 -0400,
Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
>  > > modprobe.conf has ..
>  > > alias snd-card-0 snd-emu10k1
>  > > options snd-card-0 index=0
>  > > options snd-emu10k1 index=0
>  > > remove snd-emu10k1 { /usr/sbin/alsactl store 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 || : ; }; /sbin/modprobe -r --ignore-remove snd-emu10k1
>  > > 
>  > > What changed ?
>  > 
>  > Nothing from ALSA side.  Maybe the module loading mechanism (or slot
>  > order) was changed on your system.
>  > 
>  > The scenario is:
>  > 
>  > intel8x0 driver is first loaded on the first empty slot (index=0)
>  > before snd-emu10k1.  Since you set index=0 module option for
>  > snd-emu10k1, it tried to load on the same slot but failed.
>  > 
>  > A workaround is to set index=1 option for snd-intel8x0 in addition,
>  > for using emu10k1 as the primary card.
> 
> The modprobe.conf also had an index=1 entry already for the intel driver.

Hmm, then something like a webcam with an audio device?


Takashi