From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751076AbWDCJ51@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751076AbWDCJ51 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 05:57:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751712AbWDCJ51
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 05:57:27 -0400
Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52953 "EHLO mx1.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751030AbWDCJ50 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 05:57:26 -0400
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:57:20 +0200
Message-ID: <s5h4q1bc77j.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Christian Trefzer <ctrefzer@gmx.de>,
       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       alsa-devel <alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: snd-nm256: hard lockup on every second module load after	powerup
In-Reply-To: <1143841995.27146.25.camel@mindpipe>
References: <20060326054542.GA11961@hermes.uziel.local>
	<s5hveu0chvy.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<1143500400.1792.314.camel@mindpipe>
	<20060329144303.GA24146@hermes.uziel.local>
	<20060331211240.GD22677@stusta.de>
	<1143841995.27146.25.camel@mindpipe>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
 FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.5 (beta25)
 (eggplant) (+CVS-20060326) (i386-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

At Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:53:13 -0500,
Lee Revell wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 23:12 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Actually, the changes in Linus' current git have fixed the hang for
> > me.
> > > Good job - thanks a lot, guys!
> > > 
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Chris
> > 
> > Takashi, would it be possible getting the fixes for this hard lookup 
> > into 2.6.16.2?
> > 
> 
> Is a 225 line patch to fix a driver that's never worked appropriate for
> -stable?

In addition to more 200 lines of patches to ac97 for putting every
piece into its place...

I think it's too big for -stable tree.


Takashi