From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: Add missing rwsem around snd_ctl_remove() calls
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:02:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h5ysqlcm8.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07e228eb-676a-bdb1-c2ec-a96f691f5a18@linaro.org>
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:56:14 +0100,
Alex Elder wrote:
>
> On 11/16/21 1:20 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > snd_ctl_remove() has to be called with card->controls_rwsem held (when
> > called after the card instantiation). This patch adds the missing
> > rwsem calls around it.
>
> I see the comment above snd_ctl_remove() that says you must hold
> the write lock. And given that, this seems correct to me.
>
> I understand why you want to take the lock just once, rather
> than each time snd_ctl_remove() is called.
>
> However I believe the acquisition and release of the lock
> belongs inside gbaudio_remove_controls(), not in its caller.
>
> If you disagree, can you please explain why?
In general if the function returns an error and has a loop inside,
taking a lock in the caller side avoids the forgotten unlock.
Takashi
> Otherwise, will you please submit version two, taking the
> lock inside gbaudio_remove_controls()?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Alex
>
> > Fixes: 510e340efe0c ("staging: greybus: audio: Add helper APIs for dynamic audio modules")
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c
> > index 1ed4772d2771..843760675876 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c
> > @@ -192,7 +192,11 @@ int gbaudio_remove_component_controls(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> > unsigned int num_controls)
> > {
> > struct snd_card *card = component->card->snd_card;
> > + int err;
> > - return gbaudio_remove_controls(card, component->dev, controls,
> > - num_controls, component->name_prefix);
> > + down_write(&card->controls_rwsem);
> > + err = gbaudio_remove_controls(card, component->dev, controls,
> > + num_controls, component->name_prefix);
> > + up_write(&card->controls_rwsem);
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 7:20 Takashi Iwai
2021-11-17 19:56 ` [greybus-dev] " Alex Elder
2021-11-17 21:02 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2021-11-17 21:55 ` Alex Elder
2021-11-18 3:32 ` Vaibhav Agarwal
2021-11-18 6:55 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5h5ysqlcm8.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®