From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: "Dae R. Jeong" <threeearcat@gmail.com>
Cc: perex@perex.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kt0755@gmail.com,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com, bammanag@purdue.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup in snd_virmidi_output_trigger
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:02:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h7elhupow.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727055104.GA18733@dragonet>
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 07:51:04 +0200,
Dae R. Jeong wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 07:20:30AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> I think there is a mistake on the reported-by tag.
> The reported-by tag (e4c8abb920ef...) is for WARNING in port_delete.
> I guess the tag below is correct.
> Reported-by: syzbot+619d9f40141d826b097e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Could you please make sure that the reported-by tag is correct?
Indeed, corrected now. Thanks.
> By the way, I can't reproduce the crash WARNING in port_delete so
> far. I feel sad for saying this..
> I really want to reproduce the crash and thus, to help to fix the
> crash. If there is any progress on it, I will let you know
> immediately.
This looks like a sheer race condition.
Thanks for your help in anyway!
Takashi
>
> Best regards,
> Dae R. Jeong
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 06:13:22 +0200,
> > Dae R. Jeong wrote:
> > >
> > > I tested it and it worked.
> > > Thanks a lot!
> >
> > Good to hear. Below is the final patch with a proper comment (and
> > with syzbot reported-by, too) I'm going to queue to sound.git tree.
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> > -- 8< --
> >
> > From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] ALSA: virmidi: Fix too long output trigger loop
> >
> > The virmidi output trigger tries to parse the all available bytes and
> > process sequencer events as much as possible. In a normal situation,
> > this is supposed to be relatively short, but a program may give a huge
> > buffer and it'll take a long time in a single spin lock, which may
> > eventually lead to a soft lockup.
> >
> > This patch simply adds a workaround, a cond_resched() call in the loop
> > if applicable. A better solution would be to move the event processor
> > into a work, but let's put a duct-tape quickly at first.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Dae R. Jeong <threeearcat@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+e4c8abb920efa77bace9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > ---
> > sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c
> > index 289ae6bb81d9..8ebbca554e99 100644
> > --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c
> > +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c
> > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static void snd_virmidi_output_trigger(struct snd_rawmidi_substream *substream,
> > int count, res;
> > unsigned char buf[32], *pbuf;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + bool check_resched = !in_atomic();
> >
> > if (up) {
> > vmidi->trigger = 1;
> > @@ -200,6 +201,15 @@ static void snd_virmidi_output_trigger(struct snd_rawmidi_substream *substream,
> > vmidi->event.type = SNDRV_SEQ_EVENT_NONE;
> > }
> > }
> > + if (!check_resched)
> > + continue;
> > + /* do temporary unlock & cond_resched() for avoiding
> > + * CPU soft lockup, which may happen via a write from
> > + * a huge rawmidi buffer
> > + */
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&substream->runtime->lock, flags);
> > + cond_resched();
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&substream->runtime->lock, flags);
> > }
> > out:
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&substream->runtime->lock, flags);
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 5:53 Dae R. Jeong
2018-07-26 12:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-07-26 12:58 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-26 13:07 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-07-27 4:13 ` Dae R. Jeong
2018-07-27 5:20 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-07-27 5:51 ` Dae R. Jeong
2018-07-27 7:02 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-09 5:58 syzbot
2018-04-09 13:03 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-04-09 13:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5h7elhupow.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bammanag@purdue.edu \
--cc=kt0755@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=threeearcat@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome