From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751004AbdEUHJZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2017 03:09:25 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58965 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbdEUHJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2017 03:09:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 09:09:21 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Bhumika Goyal Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Julia Lawall , perex@perex.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: sound/isa: constify snd_kcontrol_new structures In-Reply-To: References: <1495021136-6999-1-git-send-email-bhumirks@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.2 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:33:45 +0200, Bhumika Goyal wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Wed, 17 May 2017 13:38:56 +0200, > > Bhumika Goyal wrote: > >> > >> Declare snd_kcontrol_new structures as const as they are only passed an > >> argument to the function snd_ctl_new1. This argument is of type const, > >> so snd_kcontrol_new structures having this property can be made const. > >> Done using Coccinelle: > >> > >> @r disable optional_qualifier@ > >> identifier x; > >> position p; > >> @@ > >> static struct snd_kcontrol_new x@p={...}; > >> > >> @ok@ > >> identifier r.x; > >> position p; > >> @@ > >> snd_ctl_new1(&x@p,...) > >> > >> @bad@ > >> position p != {r.p,ok.p}; > >> identifier r.x; > >> @@ > >> x@p > >> > >> @depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@ > >> identifier r.x; > >> @@ > >> +const > >> struct snd_kcontrol_new x; > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal > > > > As I already asked, could you send as a patchset if you have multiple > > similar patches? > > > > Sure. Will combine the already sent ones and some new ones into a > patchset and send again. Well, since there haven't been new submissions and the patches are trivial, I applied the existing four patches. If you have newer ones, please submit as a patchset. thanks, Takashi