mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel <alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 -- Bad page state at free_hot_cold_page (in process 'aplay', page c18eef30)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:41:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h7jb2nebm.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051121162558.GD21032@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

At Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:25:58 +0000,
Russell King wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:17:12PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Now another question arises:  Which is the recommended method for
> > mmapping RAM pages, vma nopage callback or remap_pfn_range()?
> > 
> > IIRC, in the ealier versions, the former was recommended because
> > remap_page_range() with page-reserve was regarded as a hack.
> > But, looking through these changes, I feel that remap_pfn_range() is
> > better (easier and stabler) than vma nopage...
> 
> And this brings up the question of this age old patch:
> 
> diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' -r orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c
> --- orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c	Mon Apr  4 22:52:57 2005
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/pci-dma.c	Mon Apr  4 22:44:45 2005
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
>  	ret = (void *)__get_free_pages(gfp, order);
>  
>  	if (ret != NULL) {
> -		memset(ret, 0, size);
> +		memset(ret, 0, PAGE_ALIGN(size));
>  		*dma_handle = virt_to_phys(ret);
>  	}
>  	return ret;
> diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x '*.orig' -x '*.rej' -r orig/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h linux/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h
> --- orig/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h	Mon Apr  4 22:54:41 2005
> +++ linux/include/asm-i386/dma-mapping.h	Mon Apr  4 22:48:11 2005
> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@ void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *
>  void dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  			 void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle);
>  
> +static inline int
> +dma_mmap_coherent(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +		  void *vaddr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size)
> +{
> +	unsigned long offset = vma->vm_pgoff, usize;
> +
> +	size = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	usize = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (offset >= size || usize > (size - offset))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	return remap_page_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
> +				__pa(vaddr) + (offset << PAGE_SHIFT),
> +				usize << PAGE_SHIFT, vma->vm_page_prot);
> +}
> +
>  static inline dma_addr_t
>  dma_map_single(struct device *dev, void *ptr, size_t size,
>  	       enum dma_data_direction direction)
> 
> which provides the dma mmap API which presently is ARM-only on to x86.

Yes, that's nice.  It would be nice if dma_mmap_coherent() is
implemented on all architectures.

> Note: the first part of this patch should probably be applied anyway
> if you're mmaping dma_alloc_coherent pages to userspace to ensure that
> information is not leaked from kernel context.

This reminds me another thing:  x86 dma_alloc_coherent() doesn't trim
the pages between PAGE_ALIGN(size) and (1 << order).  Some archs seem
doing this right.


Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-21 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-20  6:56 Miles Lane
2005-11-20  8:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-20 18:14   ` Lee Revell
2005-11-20 19:35     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-21  6:59       ` Miles Lane
2005-11-21 11:52       ` Takashi Iwai
2005-11-21 15:46         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-21 15:52           ` Russell King
2005-11-21 16:51             ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-21 16:17           ` Takashi Iwai
2005-11-21 16:25             ` Russell King
2005-11-21 16:41               ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2005-11-21 17:09             ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5h7jb2nebm.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®