From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757521Ab2IXSIi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:08:38 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34096 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757358Ab2IXSIg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:08:36 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:08:32 +0200
Message-ID: <s5h8vbz8fa7.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: Fix compillation issues in device_prep_dma_cyclic()
In-Reply-To: <s5hmx0fomwk.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
References: <20120924133923.130c4db72aa8105cb5647d7a@canb.auug.org.au>
	<1348473485-5081-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
	<s5hmx0fomwk.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
 FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.1
 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:17:15 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:58:03 +0300,
> Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > The reason for the breakage is the patch 1 got lost somewhere in the process.
> > I also greped the whole tree for device_prep_dma_cyclic() and the second patch
> > is the result of that.
> > 
> > PS: I did build tested the series on ARM (OMAP), x86_32, x86_64 but not for ppc
> > for sure.
> 
> Thanks!  I wait for Mark merging these to his tree for a while.
> 
> Mark, could you tell me when it's ready?  Since I'll be off from
> tomorrow, I'd like to resolve sooner.

My time is up, so I merged Peter's two patches on the top of for-next
branch of sound git tree now.  Mark, please pull them to your tree if
needed.


thanks,

Takashi