From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382EEC433E3 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BCA2076D for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729479AbgGMJo7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:44:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56208 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726523AbgGMJo6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:44:58 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76429AD45; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:44:57 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Julia Lawall Cc: Dan Williams , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , SeongJae Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, James Bottomley , Dave Airlie , Christian Brauner , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v3] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology In-Reply-To: References: <159423201991.2466245.8461410729774664077.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:39:56 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:43:28 +0200, > > Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, > > > > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > > > > > + 'denylist / allowlist' > > > > > + 'blocklist / passlist' > > > > > > > > I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of > > > > patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit > > > > for those? Actually, there are two cases like: > > > > > > > > - Foo is blacklisted > > > > - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards > > > > > > > > Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not > > > > > > In the denylist? > > > > Not really, only the allowlist exists in this case. > > I'm not sure to understand. in denylist is not grammatical. It needs "a" > or "the". Ah, now I see how I confused you. The two cases I mentioned in the above are completely individual. They were found in two different drivers. I put those just as two distinct examples for the passive form usages. Sorry for unclearness. What I meant about the latter was that "not in allowlist" doesn't mean it being "in denylist". It's simply unknown. Takashi