From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, amd64-microcode <amd64-microcode@amd64.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: Avoid bogus fallback warning
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hiovycf0f.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVOuDSRsDLJ3kvQcXgscVDtgkEhpsLxGvdRBscZd_Hmyzw@mail.gmail.com>
At Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:40:24 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
At Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:40:24 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> > The commit [3e358ac2bb5b: firmware: Be a bit more verbose about direct
> > firmware loading failure] introduced a new warning message about
> > falling back to user helper, but this isn't true when
> > CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER isn't set.
> >
> > For avoiding the confusion, add a proper ifdef. And now we can remove
> > the dummy fw_load_from_user_helper(), too, since it's no longer called
> > with CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 10 ++--------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > index 7f48a6ffb0df..bb03c71bd94d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > @@ -940,14 +940,6 @@ static void kill_requests_without_uevent(void)
> > #endif
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER */
> > -static inline int
> > -fw_load_from_user_helper(struct firmware *firmware, const char *name,
> > - struct device *device, bool uevent, bool nowait,
> > - long timeout)
> > -{
> > - return -ENOENT;
> > -}
> > -
> > /* No abort during direct loading */
> > #define is_fw_load_aborted(buf) false
> >
> > @@ -1097,11 +1089,13 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_warn(device, "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> > ret);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> > if (fallback) {
> > dev_warn(device, "Falling back to user helper\n");
>
> I think it is simpler to put above line at the entry of
> fw_load_from_user_helper()
> since we always do direct-loading first, and code should be cleaner.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Ming Lei
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> > The commit [3e358ac2bb5b: firmware: Be a bit more verbose about direct
> > firmware loading failure] introduced a new warning message about
> > falling back to user helper, but this isn't true when
> > CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER isn't set.
> >
> > For avoiding the confusion, add a proper ifdef. And now we can remove
> > the dummy fw_load_from_user_helper(), too, since it's no longer called
> > with CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 10 ++--------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > index 7f48a6ffb0df..bb03c71bd94d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > @@ -940,14 +940,6 @@ static void kill_requests_without_uevent(void)
> > #endif
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER */
> > -static inline int
> > -fw_load_from_user_helper(struct firmware *firmware, const char *name,
> > - struct device *device, bool uevent, bool nowait,
> > - long timeout)
> > -{
> > - return -ENOENT;
> > -}
> > -
> > /* No abort during direct loading */
> > #define is_fw_load_aborted(buf) false
> >
> > @@ -1097,11 +1089,13 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_warn(device, "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> > ret);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> > if (fallback) {
> > dev_warn(device, "Falling back to user helper\n");
>
> I think it is simpler to put above line at the entry of
> fw_load_from_user_helper()
> since we always do direct-loading first, and code should be cleaner.
OK, that makes sense.
While looking back at the code, I think the first warning ("Direct
firmware load failed" should be suppressed, too, when no fallback is
set. For example, non-existing firmware is no error at all for
microcode driver, as a firmware is purely optional. Showing a warning
at each failure would result in lots of bogus warnings and it'd
confuse users as if something critical happened.
So, the first dev_warn() is better in the "if (fallback)" block, IMO.
I'm going to prepare the v3 patch series together with bit flags
change.
thanks,
Takashi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-11 15:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add request_firmware_direct() for microcode loader Takashi Iwai
2013-11-11 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] firmware: Introduce request_firmware_direct() Takashi Iwai
2013-11-11 15:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-11 17:30 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-11-11 19:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-11 20:05 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-11-12 2:11 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-11 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] microcode: Use request_firmware_direct() Takashi Iwai
2013-11-11 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: Avoid bogus fallback warning Takashi Iwai
2013-11-12 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-12 6:26 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hiovycf0f.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=amd64-microcode@amd64.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®