From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752613AbYIFJyE (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 05:54:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752352AbYIFJxy (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 05:53:54 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56989 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752235AbYIFJxx (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 05:53:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:53:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Dmitry Torokhov , lkml , akpm , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucb1400_ts depends SND_AC97_BUS In-Reply-To: <48C1A004.2030607@oracle.com> References: <20061209003635.e778ff76.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200612092150.02940.dtor@insightbb.com> <20061209185737.1768315d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200612092205.19358.dtor@insightbb.com> <20061209210945.5abe2d89.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080904195744.f367cd2d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080904214444.0dccf859.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <48C1A004.2030607@oracle.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.2 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:09:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:32:32 -0400 (EDT), > > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >> > >>> At Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:52:25 -0400 (EDT), > >>> Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> This was fixed 2 years ago. Who broke it this time? > >>>>> Oh, it must be me. > >>>> I think both your patch and the one I previously posted are needed. > >>> Could you repost? I can't find it easily now. > > > > Thanks. For linux-next, yes, it's needed. But it's not for 2.6.27. > > > > Meanwhile, my fix should be included in 2.6.27 since it's a > > regression. > > > > Randy, could you check whether these two patches fix your problem? > > I'll put my patch to my tree for the next pull request after your > > confirmation. > > Yes, all fixed/good. Thanks. Thanks for checking! Takashi