From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Add pciehp_surprise module option
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:11:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hppytq430.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130320175234.GA8948@srcf.ucam.org>
At Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:52:34 +0000,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:02:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > We encountered a problem that on some HP machines the Realtek PCI-e
> > card reader device appears only when you inserted a card before the
> > cold boot. While debugging, it turned out that the device is actually
> > handled via PCI-e hotplug in some level. The device sends a presence
> > change notification, and pciehp receives it, but it's ignored because
> > of lack of the hotplug surprise (PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPS) capability bit.
> > Once when this check passes, everything starts working -- the device
> > appears upon plugging the card properly.
>
> Well that just sounds like a bug. What's the downside to just ignoring
> that capability bit?
I'm afraid that it's too radical to enable always.
Or, what about to check this bit only for disable path?
Enabling the device is usually not to worry much. The problematic
part is rather the surprising device disablement.
Just my $0.02.
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 14:02 Takashi Iwai
2013-03-20 16:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2013-03-20 16:39 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-03-20 17:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-03-20 19:11 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2013-03-20 19:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-03-20 19:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-03-20 19:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-03-20 18:09 ` Alex Williamson
2013-03-20 19:08 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-03-22 16:15 ` Michal Marek
2013-03-22 16:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-03-22 16:35 ` Michal Marek
2013-03-22 16:20 ` Alex Williamson
2013-03-27 16:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-03-27 16:19 ` Michal Marek
2013-03-20 18:41 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-20 18:56 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-20 19:20 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-06-07 0:04 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-25 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-10 16:34 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-04-10 17:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-11 13:40 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hppytq430.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®