From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>,
Ricardo Cerqueira <v4l@cerqueira.org>,
mchehab@brturbo.com.br,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
video4linux-list@redhat.com, perex@suse.cz,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:39:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hpsnqzf86.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512201248481.4827@g5.osdl.org>
At Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:03:10 -0800 (PST),
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> >
> > They all load in the correct order if they are modules. The problem comes when
> > one compiles them into the kernel. They then load in the wrong order and bad
> > things happen, resulting in the recommendation that alsa should always be
> > modules.
>
> Which, as a recommendation, is pure and utter crap.
>
> > In this basis, we should not have to change the code in alsa at all, but
> > instead change the kernel to understand the load order, even if compiled into
> > the kernel and not as modules.
>
> NO.
>
> The kernel does support this (and has supported for a long time).
>
> First off, load order matters, even in the kernel. Within one "class" of
> initializers, you can just specify the right order in the Makefile, and it
> will honor them. Of course, that ends up often being hard to do across
> different directories, which is why there's another facility:
>
> The kernel has several different classes of ordering. Anybody who thinks
> that "module_init()" is it, just hasn't looked at <linux/init.h>. There's
> seven different levels:
>
> #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn)
> #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn)
> #define arch_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("3",fn)
> #define subsys_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("4",fn)
> #define fs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("5",fn)
> #define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("6",fn)
> #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("7",fn)
>
> where the next-to-last one is the regular "device_initcall()" (and this is
> what a "module_init()" in a compiled-in driver will use).
>
> Now, something like the basic sound subsystem initialization should
> obviously NOT be a "device initcall". It's not a device. It's a subsystem
> that serves devices, and thus the basic sound initialization should
> probably use "subsys_initcall()" instead.
>
> Now, if it's built as a module, that "subsys_initcall()" ends up doing
> exactly the same thing as a plain "module_init()", and you'll never see
> any difference. But when it's built into the kernel, it means that it gets
> initialized with the other subsystems.
>
> Now, one thing to look out for is that if your "core sound initialization"
> depends on PCI probing having completed (ie it's not a pure subsystem with
> no dependencies on anything else), the common hack for that is to just use
> the "fs_initicall()" instead. But a truly independent subsystem (which
> sound hopefully is) should just use subsys_initcall(), and then, if that
> subsystem internally has more complex ordering, just use the link order in
> the Makefiles to indicate that.
As far as looking at the codes, it's OK for PCI. PCI is initialized
in postcore, and the only device_initcall is for pci_init(), which
calls fixup for each PCI device. This is no problem because fixup is
called in pci_enable(), too.
But for other subsystems like ISA PnP, it may be broken since some
codes are still using module_init().
(And, interestingly, fs_initcall() is rarely used in the whole fs/
codes! "grep -r fs_initcall linux/fs" hits only one file.)
So, a "safe" solution for the time being appears to be either
- to look through the whole codes and adjust *_initcall() levels,
- to force to build saa7134-alsa as a module, or
- to move saa7134-alsa.c to sound/ directory.
> > I have no idea how to get the kernel to do this though. Any pointers?
>
> The above should hopefully make the kernel support for this obvious.
>
> I thought more people knew about all this. Forcing (or even just
> encouraging) people to use loadable modules is just horrible. I personally
> run a kernel with no modules at all: it makes for a simpler bootup, and in
> some situations (embedded) it has both security and size advantages.
Yep. The driver must work both for modules and built-in. If it
doesn't work, it's called a bug, as we all know :)
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-19 0:47 Linux 2.6.15-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 1:30 ` Diego Calleja
2005-12-19 5:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-12-20 13:18 ` 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c Adrian Bunk
2005-12-20 15:52 ` [Alsa-devel] " Sergey Vlasov
2005-12-20 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20051220183455.GC19797@master.mivlgu.local>
2005-12-20 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 19:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-20 19:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-20 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 20:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-20 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 20:47 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-12-20 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 21:13 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] Makefile: sound/ must come before drivers/ Adrian Bunk
2005-12-20 21:24 ` [Alsa-devel] " Jaroslav Kysela
2005-12-20 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 14:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-21 20:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-22 15:32 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-22 16:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-22 16:17 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-22 16:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-21 14:23 ` [Alsa-devel] 2.6.15-rc6: boot failure in saa7134-alsa.c Takashi Iwai
2005-12-21 18:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-21 18:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-21 22:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-22 11:39 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-20 20:35 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-12-20 21:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-20 22:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-21 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 13:29 ` Stephen Clark
2005-12-21 14:39 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2005-12-21 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 18:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-21 22:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-21 22:50 ` R C
2005-12-21 16:58 ` Steve deRosier
2005-12-21 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 18:41 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-20 20:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-22 0:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-22 11:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-22 1:13 ` 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla Adrian Bunk
2005-12-22 7:15 ` Greg KH
2005-12-22 12:04 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-12-29 13:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-30 19:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-22 8:52 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-22 13:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-22 14:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-22 23:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-23 15:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-12-23 17:32 ` Michael Krufky
2005-12-24 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-25 20:25 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-12-26 1:59 ` Michael Krufky
2005-12-26 2:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-22 17:11 ` Brice Goglin
[not found] ` <200512222152.05427.p_christ@hol.gr>
[not found] ` <1135291436.14685.7.camel@localhost>
2005-12-22 22:55 ` Mike Krufky
[not found] ` <200512230121.48882.p_christ@hol.gr>
2005-12-23 1:07 ` Michael Krufky
2005-12-23 11:50 ` Gottfried Haider
2006-01-02 16:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:38 ` Greg KH
2005-12-22 15:16 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hpsnqzf86.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=James@superbug.co.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@brturbo.com.br \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=v4l@cerqueira.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®