From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423112AbcFMLxh (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 07:53:37 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48577 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422954AbcFMLxg (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 07:53:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:53:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 In-Reply-To: <20160613110221.GB18194@pd.tnic> References: <20160613080748.GA19292@pd.tnic> <20160613110221.GB18194@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.5 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:02:21 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some > > crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it > > to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem. > > Right, this is where a single webpage would help when collecting all the > relevant data/links for a regression, regardless of the bugtracker. Well, Rafael created a bugzilla entry for tracking in the past, so using bugzilla as tracking tool works in general. It doesn't mean it's the best option, of course, though. In anyway, the only question is whether Thorsten feels comfortable or not. thanks, Takashi