Re: [PATCH] OSS: dmabuf: fix negative DMAbuf_get_buffer_pointer() check

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:38:57 +0200,
Roel Kluin wrote:
> 
> Too late for OSS?
> ---
> Since unsigned active_offs < 0 is even true when DMAbuf_get_buffer_pointer()
> returns negative
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>

I applied it to my git tree.  Thanks.


Takashi

> ---
> diff --git a/sound/oss/dmabuf.c b/sound/oss/dmabuf.c
> index eaf6997..1e90d76 100644
> --- a/sound/oss/dmabuf.c
> +++ b/sound/oss/dmabuf.c
> @@ -795,9 +795,9 @@ static int find_output_space(int dev, char **buf, int *size)
>  #ifdef BE_CONSERVATIVE
>  	active_offs = dmap->byte_counter + dmap->qhead * dmap->fragment_size;
>  #else
> -	active_offs = DMAbuf_get_buffer_pointer(dev, dmap, DMODE_OUTPUT);
> +	active_offs = max(DMAbuf_get_buffer_pointer(dev, dmap, DMODE_OUTPUT), 0);
>  	/* Check for pointer wrapping situation */
> -	if (active_offs < 0 || active_offs >= dmap->bytes_in_use)
> +	if (active_offs >= dmap->bytes_in_use)
>  		active_offs = 0;
>  	active_offs += dmap->byte_counter;
>  #endif
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>