From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755569Ab1CGKj4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:39:56 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49594 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751330Ab1CGKjy (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:39:54 -0500
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:39:53 +0100
Message-ID: <s5hzkp7fc3q.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel8x0m: wait a bit before warm reset check
In-Reply-To: <1299494225.2470.21.camel@t41.thuisdomein>
References: <1299366106.2470.5.camel@t41.thuisdomein>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1103060105550.6297@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
	<s5hei6jgsq9.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<1299494225.2470.21.camel@t41.thuisdomein>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
 FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.2
 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

At Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:36:34 +0100,
Paul Bolle wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 10:55 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Also, as mentioned earlier, it's better to use usleep_range() than
> > udelay().  There is no hard upper-limit in this case, and any longer
> > sleep works.
> 
> So something like, say, usleep_range(500, 1000) should be OK?

Yes.  It can be longer (as it's no path with critical time-out).


Takashi