mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Roman Kagan" <rkagan@amazon.de>,
	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Christian Loehle" <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nh-open-source@amazon.com, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM: QoS: Add a sysfs CPU latency request with a boot-time value
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 13:40:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166588@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010-b4-cpuidle-shallow-v2-1-adede7dd9077@amazon.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] locking: data race on req->node.prio in cpu_latency_qos_update_request
--

commit d19f16780c138f4d33dfa7e439454d2244724233
Author: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>

PM: QoS: Add a sysfs CPU latency request with a boot-time value

This commit adds a CPU latency limit requested by user space for all CPUs,
exposed via a sysfs attribute. It operates similarly to the per-CPU resume
latency request but acts as a single PM QoS request shared by the entire
user space.

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261008-b4-cpuidle-shallow-v1-1-c19e71127b14@amazon.de

> diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
> index 1944dbeb0d4c9..f381361939079 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/qos.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c

[ ... ]

> +static ssize_t pm_qos_cpu_latency_us_show(struct device *dev,
> +					  struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					  char *buf)
> +{
> +	s32 value = READ_ONCE(cpu_latency_qos_sysfs_req.node.prio);
> +
> +	if (value == 0)
> +		return sysfs_emit(buf, "n/a\n");
> +	if (value == PM_QOS_CPU_LATENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> +		value = 0;
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", value);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t pm_qos_cpu_latency_us_store(struct device *dev,
> +					   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					   const char *buf, size_t n)
> +{
> +	s32 value;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpu_latency_qos_parse(buf, &value);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	cpu_latency_qos_update_request(&cpu_latency_qos_sysfs_req, value);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Severity: Low]
Can concurrent writes to this sysfs attribute trigger a data race?

This calls cpu_latency_qos_update_request() on the globally shared
cpu_latency_qos_sysfs_req object without external locking. Inside
cpu_latency_qos_update_request(), there is a fast-path check:

    if (new_value == req->node.prio)
        return;

This performs a plain lockless read of req->node.prio, which concurrently
races with modifications under pm_qos_lock via plist_node_init() in
pm_qos_update_target().

The pm_qos_cpu_latency_us_show() function correctly uses READ_ONCE() for
this field, but the plain read on the update fast-path could cause KCSAN
warnings or undefined behavior if multiple threads write to the sysfs
attribute simultaneously.

> +
> +	return n;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(pm_qos_cpu_latency_us);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261010-b4-cpuidle-shallow-v2-1-adede7dd9077@amazon.de?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-10 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10 13:29 Roman Kagan
2026-10-10 13:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166588@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkagan@amazon.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®