From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mario Behn" <mario.behn@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence: recover the controller after a failed transfer
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 20:59:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-200172@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105203703.979067-1-mario.behn@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] spi: cadence: unreset speed_hz in cdns_spi_handle_err() runs bus at max clk
- [High] spi: cadence: missing IRQ sync in cdns_spi_handle_err() causes buffer UAF
- [Medium] spi: cadence: unreset CDNS_SPI_THLD in cdns_spi_handle_err() breaks target
--
commit ac57da57c19b61a2d1f323d2cee0fc683cff3b77
Author: Mario Behn <mario.behn@gmail.com>
spi: cadence: recover the controller after a failed transfer
This commit adds a handle_err callback to the Cadence spi controller driver
to mask interrupts, drain stale bytes from the receive fifo, and reinitialize
the controller hardware after a transfer times out or fails.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c
> index 50ef3a7871c22..474ce14a59b3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c
> @@ -542,6 +542,30 @@ static int cdns_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
> return transfer->len;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * cdns_spi_handle_err - Recover the controller after a failed transfer
> + * @ctlr: Pointer to the spi_controller structure
> + * @msg: Pointer to the spi_message that failed
> + *
> + * A transfer that timed out leaves the bytes it clocked in sitting in the
> + * RX FIFO, because the interrupt that reads them did not run in time and
> + * the host path never drains the FIFO between transfers. Every later
> + * transfer would then read those stale bytes first and return shifted
> + * data. Mask the interrupts, drop the stale bytes and bring the
> + * controller back to its initial state; the next message sets the clock
> + * and the chip select again on its way through transfer_one.
> + */
> +static void cdns_spi_handle_err(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
> + struct spi_message *msg)
> +{
> + struct cdns_spi *xspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);
> +
> + cdns_spi_write(xspi, CDNS_SPI_IDR, CDNS_SPI_IXR_ALL);
> + xspi->tx_bytes = 0;
> + xspi->rx_bytes = 0;
[Severity: High]
Can cdns_spi_handle_err() race with an in-flight or already-woken
cdns_spi_irq() handler when a transfer times out in spi_transfer_wait()?
In drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c, cdns_spi_probe() registers cdns_spi_irq() via
devm_request_irq() with flags set to 0, which runs as a forced threaded
handler on preempt-rt or concurrently on another processor. Writing to
CDNS_SPI_IDR masks peripheral interrupt generation, but cdns_spi_handle_err()
does not synchronize with the irq handler, nor does it clear xspi->rxbuf or
xspi->txbuf before spi_transfer_one_message() finalizes the message and the
caller frees transfer->rx_buf and transfer->tx_buf.
If cdns_spi_irq() is already running—for example, across the udelay(10) call
or inside cdns_spi_process_fifo() with local ntx and nrx counts—could it read
or write freed transfer buffers via cdns_spi_reader() and cdns_spi_writer(),
or race with cdns_spi_init_hw() while accessing hardware fifos?
In addition, cdns_spi_irq() reads raw status bits without masking against
CDNS_SPI_IMR:
drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c:cdns_spi_irq() {
intr_status = cdns_spi_read(xspi, CDNS_SPI_ISR);
cdns_spi_write(xspi, CDNS_SPI_ISR, intr_status);
...
} else if (intr_status & CDNS_SPI_IXR_TXOW) {
...
if (xspi->tx_bytes) {
cdns_spi_process_fifo(ctlr, xspi, trans_cnt, trans_cnt);
} else {
udelay(10);
cdns_spi_process_fifo(ctlr, xspi, 0, trans_cnt);
cdns_spi_write(xspi, CDNS_SPI_IDR,
CDNS_SPI_IXR_DEFAULT);
spi_finalize_current_transfer(ctlr);
}
}
Because cdns_spi_init_hw() re-enables the controller (CDNS_SPI_ER_ENABLE)
with an empty transmit fifo, CDNS_SPI_IXR_TXOW becomes set in CDNS_SPI_ISR.
If a delayed irq thread runs after cdns_spi_handle_err() finishes, wouldn't
it see CDNS_SPI_IXR_TXOW set and xspi->tx_bytes == 0, disable interrupts, and
call spi_finalize_current_transfer() prematurely on the next transfer?
> + cdns_spi_init_hw(xspi, spi_controller_is_target(ctlr));
[Severity: High]
Does calling cdns_spi_init_hw() in drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c without
resetting xspi->speed_hz leave the bus running at the maximum clock rate on
subsequent transfers?
In host mode, cdns_spi_init_hw() writes CDNS_SPI_CR_DEFAULT to CDNS_SPI_CR,
which resets the hardware baud rate divisor bits (CDNS_SPI_CR_BAUD_DIV) back
to CDNS_SPI_CR_BAUD_DIV_4 (xspi->clk_rate / 4, i.e., ctlr->max_speed_hz):
drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c:cdns_spi_init_hw() {
if (!is_target)
ctrl_reg |= CDNS_SPI_CR_DEFAULT;
...
cdns_spi_write(xspi, CDNS_SPI_CR, ctrl_reg);
}
When the next transfer runs cdns_transfer_one() -> cdns_spi_setup_transfer()
-> cdns_spi_config_clock_freq(), it only reprograms the divisor if
xspi->speed_hz differs from transfer->speed_hz:
drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c:cdns_spi_config_clock_freq() {
ctrl_reg = cdns_spi_read(xspi, CDNS_SPI_CR);
/* Set the clock frequency */
if (xspi->speed_hz != transfer->speed_hz) {
...
ctrl_reg &= ~CDNS_SPI_CR_BAUD_DIV;
ctrl_reg |= baud_rate_val << CDNS_SPI_BAUD_DIV_SHIFT;
xspi->speed_hz = frequency / (2 << baud_rate_val);
}
cdns_spi_write(xspi, CDNS_SPI_CR, ctrl_reg);
}
If the next transfer requests the same frequency that was cached in
xspi->speed_hz before the error, won't cdns_spi_config_clock_freq() skip
updating CDNS_SPI_CR_BAUD_DIV and leave the hardware running at clk_rate / 4
instead of the requested speed?
[Severity: Medium]
What happens in target mode if a transfer with xspi->tx_bytes >
xspi->tx_fifo_depth fails while another message is already queued on the
controller?
In drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c, cdns_transfer_one() raises CDNS_SPI_THLD for
large target transfers:
drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c:cdns_transfer_one() {
if (!spi_controller_is_target(ctlr)) {
cdns_spi_setup_transfer(spi, transfer);
} else {
if (xspi->tx_bytes > xspi->tx_fifo_depth)
cdns_spi_write(xspi, CDNS_SPI_THLD, xspi->tx_fifo_depth >> 1);
}
}
Normally CDNS_SPI_THLD is reset to 0x1 either in cdns_spi_irq() when
xspi->tx_bytes drops below half the fifo depth or in
cdns_unprepare_transfer_hardware() when the queue becomes idle. Neither
cdns_spi_handle_err() nor cdns_spi_init_hw() resets CDNS_SPI_THLD to 0x1.
If a large target transfer is interrupted in spi_transfer_wait() and another
message is queued behind it, __spi_pump_messages() starts the next message
without calling cdns_unprepare_transfer_hardware(). If the next transfer has
tx_bytes <= tx_fifo_depth, should cdns_spi_handle_err() or cdns_spi_init_hw()
reset CDNS_SPI_THLD to 0x1 so that CDNS_SPI_IXR_TXOW does not fire
immediately with xspi->tx_bytes == 0 and complete the transfer prematurely?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105203703.979067-1-mario.behn@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 20:37 Mario Behn
2026-11-05 20:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-200172@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mario.behn@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®