From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:27:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:27:05 -0500 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:58557 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:26:52 -0500 To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: 2.4.17:Increase number of anonymous filesystems beyond 256? In-Reply-To: <200201171855.g0HIt1314492@devserv.devel.redhat.com> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 18 Jan 2002 13:26:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200201171855.g0HIt1314492@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Pete Zaitcev writes: > Anyone cares to review? Trond? Viro? Have you discussed the choice of device number with hpa (device@lanana.org)? Although the numbers you chose were marked as 'obsolete', you really ought to ensure that they get reserved. Otherwise, things look pretty straightforward... Cheers, Trond