From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261824AbTJWVzt (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:55:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261825AbTJWVzt (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:55:49 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:4501 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261824AbTJWVzs (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:55:48 -0400 To: Andre Tomt Cc: Philipp Matthias Hahn , Marcelo Tosatti , Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.23-pre8 References: <20031023181251.GA5490@titan.lahn.de> <1066944036.4293.103.camel@slurv> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 23 Oct 2003 16:55:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1066944036.4293.103.camel@slurv> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Andre Tomt writes: > Did you patch your source with > ea+acl+nfsacl-2.4.22-0.8.63.diff.gz? vanilla -pre8 looks fine, > however a strikingly similar hunk is in the ea+acl+nfsacl > patch: > It looks safe to just nuke this hunk from the acl patch. Indeed. It would appear to be quite incorrect to return ENOSYS in this case, since glibc tends to interpret that as meaning that an actual syscall is not implemented. > NB: Always test a clean kernel tree ;-) Right... Or else report bugs to the maintainers of the patches you have applied rather than to me. Cheers, Trond