From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:20:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:20:20 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:24253 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:20:10 -0400 To: Chris Mason Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: [RFC] yet another knfsd-reiserfs patch In-Reply-To: <134680000.991430407@tiny> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 02 Jun 2001 00:19:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: Chris Mason's message of "Fri, 01 Jun 2001 17:20:07 -0400" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chris, Do you really need the parent inode in the filehandle? That screws rename up pretty badly, since the filehandle changes when you rename into a different directory. It means for instance that when I do open(foo) mv foo bar/ write (foo) close(foo) then I have a pretty good chance of getting an ESTALE on the write() statement. Cheers, Trond