From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932653AbVISVB7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:01:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932655AbVISVB7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:01:59 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:65199 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932653AbVISVB6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:01:58 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andreas Happe Subject: Re: ipw2200 using old wireless extensions Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:00:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4329E09B.9020807@drzeus.cx> <432F0BC6.3040100@tmr.com> <432F1280.3040209@pobox.com> Reply-To: Andreas Happe X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: client068.9220.easyline.at User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2005-09-19, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Is this related to using the old 1.0.0 driver instead of current? I >> asked why and never got an answer, so ??? > > Because we're waiting on Intel, or someone, to update the driver properly. > > Jeff Would it be possible to rate limit the warning messages (if the full solution will take longer)? my dmesg is filled rather quick with those messages (ipw2100). Andreas Happe