From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965185AbWJ2PJg (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:09:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965186AbWJ2PJg (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:09:36 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41427 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965185AbWJ2PJf (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:09:35 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Oleg Verych Subject: Re: -W -Wno-unused -Wno-sign-compare compile flags Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Palacky University in Olomouc, experimental physics department. Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: flower.upol.cz Mail-Followup-To: LKML , Oleg Verych User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2006-10-29, someone from wrote: > Hello !linux-kernel > > Does anybody try to compile latest linux-kernel with -W > -Wno-unused -Wno-sign-compare CFLAGS? There is a tons of > warnings :( > Recent versions of grsecurity patches adds this flags to > default. When I asked to grsec developers, why did they do > that, they answered: to show, how messy linux code is... Yes, it is. You are welcome to fix it. ____