From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out203-205-251-66.mail.qq.com (out203-205-251-66.mail.qq.com [203.205.251.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2ADBA42; Fri, 24 May 2024 03:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.205.251.66 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716521739; cv=none; b=MgA1zZAcqxwoySUoXMHL+oZx8ts2GbxUE9QDQNUnyMrWnDiH7IDAImy6asUerODqthxzeVJo+ZcNgbxYApxw22wdWYJDYmBfxCkUtbEavgWTLIXcxCNYCYcQg0PT6Np4q3Awdm3XRLeLN8NVViNxzX/VRd1JLx+UD6f/i8TxNAo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716521739; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v/etBkosMFj4M2oPaBJKAHkK2i4tRVWfz7TuY2sG3uk=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:MIME-Version; b=e63eTffiRpJqx4INJJzKLOoGhp3T175wWsun/W84MV1Hhdm3NI7Jg3lJGw8uxMy3puWbZ1pJf+VNImarBkwFWDPzoziaSum7W+Vr78vVDdCWmXBfAcDPgfnd6+/U6DozPRywId+D715rAThDCf2eEcyTDLjSL2WAaLvBlbp4E1o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cyyself.name; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cyyself.name; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b=KutrFRiR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.205.251.66 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cyyself.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cyyself.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b="KutrFRiR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1716521719; bh=53Bt51sNUYf9oOYR2CzwqoJVUCqj8xxRiJcxNZztIWA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=KutrFRiR1X/ofcm+XqPcgrPU6EZsmVdZgvWzWwMhAURDpHNQY3VFYQJ/bbDx3uVA8 M7xmY/c42ahI+ZABBiKzYrhap8CJ/KLJwQCGQVS1j591E+26+YEMkrHqUp5l2Nieqw IrzcLVXkEf05K8sXnhK1cQX44AKnUpinwHiuz47E= Received: from cyy-pc.lan ([240e:379:2259:4c00:b652:79f2:d4c3:c8a8]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc5-2.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 8CA030B5; Fri, 24 May 2024 11:35:10 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1716521710tp2bocgn8 Message-ID: X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NPETcIssjKadSb3TOwqMbhYICRRXdt1F3cf1iEHrJeUzI+PTele0wDCTw2XHJH zXOCoHIJJKmKD7ovYOdGALY2ZHUMk8Te1K7k3dshNmyxRvmWsgeR3SU/iOeIqKRfj0xcH/X/iwy+ Fz3jNl8VaTc1Vq70mxxx9cwX87fKpHP8bWzMSdcRCPGaqWDq95O/a4oytnPyqzIrv9WZqsYTAdVJ QMP3JbyE5N1PT6ZWcOYaYFKBEuFztQQQ4Y6acWpkOhk4kB/JUzovKuBVSxqlGOzE2r4Gthw8I+vi gvFCV//CODEHA6qPuPUG7URzaO9570CQaX5k6Uk8OKi2szJ4dRQHeJuOrKUFY53Imxvyapn6KCo8 pOihMEZYdbA6KyqpqRUyYnoSQqSPdie0H5u7Mv83ww1WA4YWqjuzYnooY0D6AyNXbFG6UMBEsB5G llo+26MVDnw9r6hgXuWQpTTgy621+nWKJxoMlGBCyRatqfGTFEmiz42l37LT7Y/ISyFADXqHdkZQ +b1RzVUkEDRPBAI3Bd6Sob223c/loF9SZfFFqlHGDxXkjmQwzeHZbI19V+9L0chfDPA6z50NVXhp l5gzJ3E3TIMfJol+K2QT9ifr3luXK1oNpmkWFihgNdxMvFv0nVPOxdNXzdsabeINzAC+v6iFOrEm hFCkOXq3rPvVIdCcezJDId/cfcZlhXpgZm/WqyJLJbt8c1mrNLfHpbCCa3AlRhsUi884IgUnb+bv rZU35bdVfdzRFjnX2+kQezOLFAlAC6ghz6K9H65il8W/7ooLSn1ZlXW+SAqdbh4TncEpD0e9S7Fe 44ooOJK5LEsrKcA+cnnz+wmuWSalYqV4tRDvXHhALI2ydmpAOjvHLNpblEQuxZBpLLhq1Z5H+QE1 ZKda4sqtaNjjBB3isrHQJaIDh7sPqGv+VL1J/efyC9AkvLSZMa79h0zA9eqvD0AOXM0hEIwGxS8S j3DtsD9UTy61cpAw2N5F+KftLPo5aA/54R+f3Nf+z0tQ7JJn8naWF9u+G89xO824+g3Eow0Awy9c lH9xbcow== X-QQ-XMRINFO: OD9hHCdaPRBwq3WW+NvGbIU= From: Yangyu Chen To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Elliott Hughes , Charlie Jenkins , Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Evan Green , =?UTF-8?q?Cl=C3=A9ment=20L=C3=A9ger?= , Conor Dooley , Andrew Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Yangyu Chen Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] docs: riscv: Some clarifies on hwprobe misaligned performance Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 11:34:50 +0800 X-OQ-MSGID: <20240524033450.298658-1-cyy@cyyself.name> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This patchset clarifies some unclear things about hwprobe's misaligned performance. Including: - hwprobe misaligned performance is only applied to scalar from patch [1] - The defined keys of RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* are values not bitmasks I cherry-picked [1] rather than write dependency because the original patch was submitted with lines wrapped to 80 characters. We can't directly apply that patch using `git am` . Changes in v2: - Add fixes to the code in arch/riscv/and include/asm/hwprobe.h v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/tencent_9D721BDDF88C04DBB5151D57711D62524209@qq.com/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJgzZorn5anPH8dVPqvjVWmLKqTi5bkLDR=FH-ZAcdXFnNe8Eg@mail.gmail.com/ Yangyu Chen (2): docs: riscv: hwprobe: Clarify misaligned keys are values not bitmasks RISC-V: hwprobe: not treat KEY_CPUPERF_0 as bitmask enh (1): docs: riscv: Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs. Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++++------------ arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.45.1