From: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
To: heming.zhao@suse.com
Cc: eadavis@qq.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark@fasheh.com,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: fix oob in __ocfs2_find_path
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:55:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_585DA45DC5993F4FCC0DA6A5F38DBD921207@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5wws3jiutruexkk4wl34wootqtfggj2h6ezrbemvtn7ykgsumq@3komfzq36st4>
Patch 2f26f58df041 modifies the definition of the array l_recs, specifying
the number of its members as l_count. In the path shown in [1], it will
first read the inode block where the system file directory is located
from the disk, and then read the l_count of each extension block from
the disk according to the extension list of the directory. Then the
value is 0 before l_count is read. If the array l_recs member is directly
accessed, the oob in [1] will be triggered.
The loop terminates when l_count is 0, similar to when next_free is 0.
[1]
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1838:11
index 0 is out of range for type 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[] __counted_by(l_count)' (aka 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[]')
Call Trace:
__ocfs2_find_path+0x606/0xa40 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1838
ocfs2_find_leaf+0xab/0x1c0 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1946
ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache+0x172/0xc60 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:418
ocfs2_get_clusters+0x505/0xa70 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:631
ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks+0x202/0x6a0 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:678
ocfs2_read_virt_blocks+0x286/0x930 fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c:1001
ocfs2_read_dir_block fs/ocfs2/dir.c:521 [inline]
ocfs2_find_entry_el fs/ocfs2/dir.c:728 [inline]
ocfs2_find_entry+0x3e4/0x2090 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1120
ocfs2_find_files_on_disk+0xdf/0x310 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2023
ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name+0x52/0x100 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2045
_ocfs2_get_system_file_inode fs/ocfs2/sysfile.c:136 [inline]
ocfs2_get_system_file_inode+0x326/0x770 fs/ocfs2/sysfile.c:112
ocfs2_init_global_system_inodes+0x319/0x660 fs/ocfs2/super.c:461
ocfs2_initialize_super fs/ocfs2/super.c:2196 [inline]
ocfs2_fill_super+0x4432/0x65b0 fs/ocfs2/super.c:993
get_tree_bdev_flags+0x40e/0x4d0 fs/super.c:1691
vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1751
fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1199 [inline]
Fixes: 2f26f58df041 ("ocfs2: annotate flexible array members with __counted_by_le()")
Reported-by: syzbot+151afab124dfbc5f15e6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=151afab124dfbc5f15e6
Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
---
v1 -> v2: check l_count and update comments
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 58bf58b68955..44bbc51276de 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -1812,14 +1812,16 @@ static int __ocfs2_find_path(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci,
ret = -EROFS;
goto out;
}
- if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0 ||
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) == 0) {
ocfs2_error(ocfs2_metadata_cache_get_super(ci),
- "Owner %llu has empty extent list at depth %u\n",
+ "Owner %llu has empty extent list at depth %u "
+ "(next free=%u count=%u)\n",
(unsigned long long)ocfs2_metadata_cache_owner(ci),
- le16_to_cpu(el->l_tree_depth));
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_tree_depth),
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec), le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
ret = -EROFS;
goto out;
-
}
for(i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) - 1; i++) {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 9:34 [syzbot] [ocfs2?] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds " syzbot
2025-12-15 14:09 ` [PATCH] ocfs2: fix oob " Edward Adam Davis
2025-12-19 4:12 ` Heming Zhao
2025-12-19 4:52 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-12-19 4:55 ` Edward Adam Davis [this message]
2025-12-19 6:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Heming Zhao
2025-12-19 7:00 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-12-19 7:25 ` Heming Zhao
2025-12-19 7:42 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-12-19 7:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Edward Adam Davis
2025-12-19 7:59 ` Heming Zhao
2025-12-19 8:31 ` [PATCH v4] " Edward Adam Davis
2025-12-19 10:07 ` Heming Zhao
2025-12-21 11:25 ` Joseph Qi
2025-12-19 3:21 ` Forwarded: Re: [syzbot] [ocfs2?] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds " syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_585DA45DC5993F4FCC0DA6A5F38DBD921207@qq.com \
--to=eadavis@qq.com \
--cc=eadavis@qq.org \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®