From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out203-205-221-210.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-210.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 574D01DE3BA; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 07:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.205.221.210 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744876102; cv=none; b=fKJOCiKNZfuAZPsL71r+6jnUecfgjaZvxRnbf/43zdAO7pob4uIBnq4C7zt0eIkzAkgZv4ZvHtItjQx26vFp0WcjJ+aajJlSFXZKoFCsH+9Gbg9a9wKOrRfga9AFMGmAymLJbMqcnNECWPEcB6W5t4aQFdNUSbyEt7kX27OVeLY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744876102; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g69U3MXxWXrTcJzezoDF5hQtVmdFyUMPr2vui6AhBd8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Ona6zFl/TL55hSSS90gg13onWzhAP3c3GW72EsKUM5jhFfC7ZeR90VV8khQy9zq+yzZ0IpacidDC9MAMXxtT29ccaTrMsaeljuBGL/QSWsNbu7Ia+njtB+b3mlA5LyzLxNNMayfuocHOdNHxPF8kv5MLkYZ0t+zj++9Vrx3gfE4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=qq.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qq.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b=bvJrstqz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.205.221.210 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=qq.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qq.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b="bvJrstqz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1744876088; bh=jtLqqxgkkS7hjzhrNQSkLpeFrvyKORWwVkpEiRFM2y8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=bvJrstqzWSBhPkVWeMYuT4HIziUbUr2BmpzDrBQUj9Aj+f6SdLWVxoUWR/PA7X7E/ XaF3W1MVMkWlEOwAt1sYQiXWyQqe+vD9rXwHI7L92zGR6FIOYqeHiGkhd/c/PPfPrn /SawPI1AAUjKf5cOPHXoG+dyDSMW9pCf4JHBEdW0= Received: from [10.42.13.21] ([116.128.244.169]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza29-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id A7A83A38; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:41:58 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1744875718tyr8k8gfy Message-ID: X-QQ-XMAILINFO: Ntt/5q+SsafOsnPnwUxg9cH2jNPvQoJzy31D/qLKszyBC1og0zhcJchIQtlALw yhx15RO9RGMw20WtvpxUWUQo20XfMgAfPdLgw+wKOYbTvty1D9A3BPY5mDdcZXA8kGUlQ6MeoRQz /ZJC81lKrRE2ViL5gjYfMb/V8y5poj4OG6byl/wOFmwWyiRah8joVvZF5bQjJ3J3DRbIYtmG2Kiv 2qRyNkjpH6fN6uv9TuCakoF7A1yolmQ0z6hhsHEWNPDp/R/VxQp2GkLFA9q7VIx0P0XbQG7E/Ekj OvY/BSzVoOelpQJ/tZHl5TAmOaN5mH2/l/xZQhvA4bxlIPtqWhJ5lUZzOTBG23CH6XU28+RtGodS 0jMRKlUefrQD4Z6MCcB1yA247Rn8egl9Un4AzfRIAyZ8DHUE56yF4Lxhcyvmv8gp6lZP7E9x7Ixt bObvD8JGkmjRr8nWbVgnFMUkVWgQHJBEiPF4IA+z5csJGd7KrUHPWtpqXLtonmRMd+H6e6dmNERX vbsNV74B+BAT8pOsMs9wqmTotDoBPjzV3WjjykVFFcL3Z8cBO1M2M/4Jm+kMl6tKuGEU02Vjsc5K R8lBwCeXRgYRTgOwH0YlP3a815PNuFzmc3O6AKENw6nJULxm1G2T0J6yPjDLia5ZIqhMA7WouB3c yM7yCLhagWCeicBWMhWdwnThoKWfJVCXttrr577B2vvHWrJgmDN13AtxiC4YwsjiRdZ78aNPTiT9 TsWsu3TAvz8q1QkKBlEpZTowIQYUNJe8bXSnJ6YcbaljQYTpMUtxhQzseIp3WKLni4gMZDmeMdqG MAo/xIaxinbMgSKdL9BcyzDcKOUW5BmpPUELmQcBo0HRxZOAIvMmH7TmVmSdrSvbTVEMiKSuiDPC X4+PF7yY9M3CV50P9eCCZ9HPb0TbvyeHZxu+mFLPa4WeITYu/BSs3caw0yjgrLAA7RZ4+yGlTlU7 7a8FCGy9crh+Aeg6wyA5aT8wGTtgfgTvFgLOCBRKxwzGnYQf4HoEDqvF7ZJgXnEDvCPXj3zPYUvM d4azrXsp5PxJmD9HPDKx5CEXsYHzU= X-QQ-XMRINFO: NyFYKkN4Ny6FSmKK/uo/jdU= X-OQ-MSGID: Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:41:58 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM: EM: Fix potential division-by-zero error in em_compute_costs() To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Lukasz Luba , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yaxiong Tian , rafael@kernel.org, Konstantin Ryabitsev References: <143378b0-5740-4f2b-9a79-f04cf9ef1f77@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Yaxiong Tian In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 在 2025/4/17 15:20, Geert Uytterhoeven 写道: > Hi Yaxiong, > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 11:14, Yaxiong Tian wrote: >> I wasn’t sure whether the new patch should reuse the current Message-ID >> or create a new one, so I checked with ChatGPT and kept the original >> Message-ID for v2. If a new Message-ID is required, I can resend the >> email. > > Different (revisions of) patches must have different Message-IDs, > else they can no longer be distinguished by our tooling. > Fortunately it seems like you didn't succeed (which is good ;-), > as all four revisions do have different Message-IDs: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_8478BF8F2549630842D323E7394CB6F49D08@qq.com/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_EE27C7D1D6BDB3EE57A2C467CC59A866C405@qq.com/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_6D2374392DB66C9D23BF6E2546638A42EC08@qq.com/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_2256A7C02F7849F1D89390E488704E826D06@qq.com/ > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > Thank you for your explanation. My previous description might have been a bit unclear. Actually, what I meant was whether it should be --in- reply-to=original Message-ID. I think if it's a patch, replying to the original Message-ID would be better.