mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 1sh1ro <yangguikun19@qq.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kasan: Fix false-positive wild-memory-access on x86 under 5-level paging
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:06:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_8BA9ABDFF623474ECBA6E251A03E19512808@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624234510.GHajxsBgG62PHgEZa4@fat_crate.local>

Hi,

I hit the same false positive and can add a data point that seems relevant for
the fix: it still reproduces on 7.3-rc5, i.e. after the CPUID rewrite that was
expected to take care of it.  The rewrite is in 7.3 -- get_cpu_cap() became
cpu_detect() -- and that is exactly the function my crashes interrupt.

Two occurrences, two kernels:

7.2.0-rc5:
  BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in do_raw_spin_lock+0x11c/0x270
  Write of size 4 at addr ff110000158860a8 by task swapper/0/0
   <IRQ> kasan_check_range; do_raw_spin_lock; handle_edge_irq+0x2e;
         __common_interrupt; common_interrupt
   RIP: get_cpu_cap+0x12f/0xc10
        identify_cpu+0x2f9  <- arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x58 <- start_kernel+0x373

7.3.0-rc5:
  BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in _raw_spin_lock+0x71/0xe0
  Write of size 4 at addr ff110000010ca8a8 by task swapper/0/0
   <IRQ> kasan_check_range; _raw_spin_lock; handle_edge_irq+0x2e;
         __common_interrupt; common_interrupt
   RIP: cpu_detect+0x20a/0x470
        identify_cpu+0x2df  <- arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x25 <- start_kernel+0x39c

The 5-level hypothesis matches what I measured on the 7.2-rc5 kernel:
page_offset_base is ff11000000000000, so the faulting address is physical
0x158860a8; /proc/iomem puts that immediately past the kernel image (Kernel bss
ends at 0x15577fff) and /proc/kpageflags reports SLAB for that PFN -- an
ordinary early-boot slab page (most likely the irq_desc itself), and KASAN
prints no "belongs to the object/cache" section for it.  So I agree this is a
false positive rather than a genuinely wild access.

Impact, in case it helps argue for the stable one-liner Borislav mentioned:
with panic_on_warn=1 (the syzkaller/syzbot default) this panics the booting
kernel, so fuzzing VMs fail to start; I currently work around it by booting
with panic_on_warn=0, which also loses real warnings.

Rate: rare and load-dependent -- 0 hits in 60 clean boots, but the fuzzer
(under load) saw it about 3 times in two weeks, so it is reproducible with
patience.

I filed it as <20261013015904.44144-kasan-early-boot@yangguikun19.qq.com> (both splats included) before finding this
thread.

Thanks,
1sh1ro


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 17:56 Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-10 18:39 ` Andrey Konovalov
2026-06-10 21:55   ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-12 16:30 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-06-12 19:42   ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-17 22:13 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-18 16:55   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2026-06-18 17:09   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-18 18:12     ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-18 18:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-23  0:29         ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-24  2:57           ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-24 22:45             ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-24 23:45               ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]                 ` <20261013015904.44144-kasan-early-boot@yangguikun19.qq.com>
2026-10-12 18:06                   ` 1sh1ro [this message]
2026-10-12 19:21                     ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-23  0:35     ` Ihor Solodrai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tencent_8BA9ABDFF623474ECBA6E251A03E19512808@qq.com \
    --to=yangguikun19@qq.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®