From: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
To: syzbot+355da3b3a74881008e8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shaggy@kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] jfs: Prevent setting of nlink with value 0 from disk inode
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 15:33:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_9D234F848D9AA5F68DB912075DB4DDDC1907@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <673f2511.050a0220.3c9d61.016e.GAE@google.com>
syzbot report a deadlock in diFree. [1]
When calling "ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64", the offset value passed in is 4,
which does not match the mounted loop device, causing the mapping of the
mounted loop device to be invalidated.
When creating the directory and creating the inode of iag in diReadSpecial(),
read the page of fixed disk inode (AIT) in raw mode in read_metapage(), the
metapage data it returns is corrupted, which causes the nlink value of 0 to be
assigned to the iag inode when executing copy_from_dinode(), which ultimately
causes a deadlock when entering diFree().
To avoid this, first check the nlink value of dinode before setting iag inode,
if the value is 0, set it to 1.
[1]
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index]));
lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index]));
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309:
#0: ffff8880422a4420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515
#1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline]
#1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x260/0x540 fs/namei.c:4026
#2: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630
#3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2460 [inline]
#3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline]
#3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x4b7/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669
#4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2477 [inline]
#4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline]
#4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x869/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5309 Comm: syz-executor301 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3037
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3089 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3891
__lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889
jfs_evict_inode+0x32d/0x440 fs/jfs/inode.c:156
evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
diFreeSpecial fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:552 [inline]
duplicateIXtree+0x3c6/0x550 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:3022
diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2597 [inline]
diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline]
diAllocAG+0x17dc/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669
diAlloc+0x1d2/0x1630 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1590
ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xba0 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline]
__x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Reported-by: syzbot+355da3b3a74881008e8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=355da3b3a74881008e8f
Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
---
fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c
index a360b24ed320..78892d252159 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c
@@ -3035,6 +3035,7 @@ static int copy_from_dinode(struct dinode * dip, struct inode *ip)
{
struct jfs_inode_info *jfs_ip = JFS_IP(ip);
struct jfs_sb_info *sbi = JFS_SBI(ip->i_sb);
+ u32 di_nlink;
jfs_ip->fileset = le32_to_cpu(dip->di_fileset);
jfs_ip->mode2 = le32_to_cpu(dip->di_mode);
@@ -3053,7 +3054,9 @@ static int copy_from_dinode(struct dinode * dip, struct inode *ip)
ip->i_mode |= 0001;
}
}
- set_nlink(ip, le32_to_cpu(dip->di_nlink));
+
+ di_nlink = le32_to_cpu(dip->di_nlink);
+ set_nlink(ip, di_nlink > 0 ? di_nlink : 1);
jfs_ip->saved_uid = make_kuid(&init_user_ns, le32_to_cpu(dip->di_uid));
if (!uid_valid(sbi->uid))
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-21 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-21 12:18 [syzbot] [jfs?] possible deadlock in diFree (2) syzbot
2024-12-19 2:56 ` [syzbot] " syzbot
2024-12-19 8:24 ` syzbot
2024-12-19 8:52 ` syzbot
2024-12-21 7:33 ` Edward Adam Davis [this message]
2024-12-24 8:17 ` [PATCH V2] jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode Edward Adam Davis
2025-02-19 16:38 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Dave Kleikamp
2025-02-20 11:13 ` [PATCH V3] " Edward Adam Davis
2025-02-20 16:15 ` Dave Kleikamp
2025-02-20 23:22 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-02-20 23:28 ` Dave Kleikamp
2025-02-22 0:16 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-02-24 14:56 ` Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_9D234F848D9AA5F68DB912075DB4DDDC1907@qq.com \
--to=eadavis@qq.com \
--cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+355da3b3a74881008e8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®