From: Alan <3164729207@qq.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Alan <3164729207@qq.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: free the new extent block when getting its buffer fails
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:27:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_9EB8EBE910378E46C80E006C6A7DA918BA08@qq.com> (raw)
ext4_ext_grow_indepth() allocates and accounts a metadata block before
calling sb_getblk_gfp(). If the buffer allocation fails, the new block
has not been linked into the extent tree, but the error path returns
without freeing it. This leaks the block and leaves i_blocks larger
than the number of blocks reachable from the inode.
Commit 8a83ac54940d ("ext4: call bdev_getblk() from sb_getblk_gfp()")
removed the implicit __GFP_NOFAIL from this allocation, making this
error path reachable.
Free the new metadata block before returning -ENOMEM. Use
ext4_free_blocks() to undo both the allocation and inode accounting.
Tested on Linux 6.12.1 by injecting a NULL result at the caller's buffer
acquisition boundary. Before the fix, seven failed extent tree growth
operations left seven allocated but unreachable blocks and i_blocks of
40 instead of 32 on a filesystem with 4 KiB blocks. After the fix, the
same failures leave i_blocks at 32, and e2fsck -fn passes after a normal
unmount. Retrying the operation, truncating the file, and growing the
tree without injection also succeed.
Fixes: 8a83ac54940d ("ext4: call bdev_getblk() from sb_getblk_gfp()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alan <3164729207@qq.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index ad0d80e33f6090..7358df54bcd4ae 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1333,8 +1333,12 @@ static int ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return err;
bh = sb_getblk_gfp(inode->i_sb, newblock, __GFP_MOVABLE | GFP_NOFS);
- if (unlikely(!bh))
+ if (unlikely(!bh)) {
+ /* The new block has not been linked into the extent tree yet. */
+ ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, newblock, 1,
+ EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
lock_buffer(bh);
err = ext4_journal_get_create_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
base-commit: d135ab453a7400a34930bdda1ef4bdc8acfac80e
--
2.53.0
reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_9EB8EBE910378E46C80E006C6A7DA918BA08@qq.com \
--to=3164729207@qq.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®