From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out203-205-221-191.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-191.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3662223D7F5; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 01:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.205.221.191 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773796577; cv=none; b=JEKu+9DuUNytAimhqBBs/g90ZnNp596wDVnAGFBGJt//NDYpJE2olqyDu/EdywPe61+9fDjqWr1/FMd1GsOk5kepyi7IHIU0CS7l7e2FLRQszy4Z4XXiSlfuY04fszC5nH9MhLqk8/5fdUh7xGpX8XTaBsbKwS65onepaLZYGjk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773796577; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sslQ9piJpglnmlV5nlzNzSOB9KwZE1kbPU7Plv7dG6U=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=BQkgiVXpbCtJ+Y5kMVgmpH8EvAX4nEGpP+3RHft0fyIeHWCp3C/wDIlPFkyYC/DwYkROfIlgI0AO5w40JmBm9DvQOWrzahKr6opeKCPv1XBfhAYrrjqs7JwUzAebRz2WKcMW9l6E4GZUAVPowD1QoHchT+8Fwdf77Zv4p3n/Skw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=qq.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qq.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b=HDh7buDf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.205.221.191 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=qq.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qq.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b="HDh7buDf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1773796565; bh=sslQ9piJpglnmlV5nlzNzSOB9KwZE1kbPU7Plv7dG6U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=HDh7buDfvq1wKYK58G+L/g3L9YyjhCyZrdqeGgdyIOX9sa/uFv4HVQ7HkBDpP6dNE EtPOJo1PVF3+hHwex8hwCHzpnYdFfcql+lg+2EfTiidmcdIR+WFFMjsP2vQV4EJTMx cSe01nud6RagrYz0yWYmcei+yyLAePHQ6xGBqw2U= Received: from lxu-ped-host.. ([111.198.231.89]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza63-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 4020BA0D; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:16:02 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1773796562t4o3uw1m5 Message-ID: X-QQ-XMAILINFO: M1rD3f8svNznxpCmW3QjH4uezzWl3N4V6/BII0DGRpBEchk+iMsi4Eh2GN1Elc +/Yk+gR5W5PRtUjVXdZv/3X1XGX4CNkyUB+q4QSLh0KIyJFzSDtNpLVad5Q1KGgSrDK6bl7oxt1U ov4bIFwMcWlszKGxxHEqQJWVmu7C1k6WZf6e1BreKUQncAmmKRX8ijtY7TXFWkhgAWzM4ZQxGQq4 5Eutdjs2rPsRTqUTv/AA9Fzp0iRGPG/88Ut7ZpC0DoNOvSK2UNtNpQK0hoDAuUT/NWiUYVZ0SQ5C VwDBJ5agVDFMivPi3pHxzrYUGF2MoGFY7lxiXOboTKKZNjKVlianP30Dw23ydTKH+ISFAfgEbZ+y 2hFHaa3t/PafFWDq0gZ1/DMhkv4l59hc6cGXqxrymZnkWFDqw0TFD2FqGIANAnkq2nXhOXam82IW CqOtYa9gLY4nR28M4fzP1MZ3a9NcVTN+ePaJl8cXSK2HdAYLfgPiMOBuYHL17vCLVFgIBKridfia BVS9G35gTwm7XRpZ21apzwXGJXjsYcP+e1wOfSEjjatJz0RKkwZ2TJZoDYSwf3T/NPkph869l8wI ZOWYxXpjeUj2GBlrdAuSezrurN7MqzLdceED/E30eYPIrBDXXA8pu+JvIFui9twC/EARj9hpuQDu XWNT4NibCc8ChsvC+S6Mvm2LwJsEVAn58J4mnf4+RHZEWRMWGH4AqYGFgrAtrAeI5BTwHOACKV4y yW7JZGxslcAvmWvL6fpQ1XDIAX+0EpI4iLYmIDGEJ3miAWMmheYHBvyqPfODYydwX9e4F54BHmOF unG0En8VnPmB+ZOC/nVqxG8HrKOf+lKxlE6+HD8lFO7/+7Q0+HuJeK3ePGWCoQ8onoY3NpfXTXcN r5Y6wxOVAFVuhb7UVQeixzoScX0yJ5hMhJNpN2VtgV0NVQr8xQj3zfHNH+hirHbU0QWJY/0YfZx0 zIOc1/TcMiAPOHtqdYEIbf2F030EDU8ccvv2lwqEdG4AToGRmvrEdD40Pnd469aGEos3nJ5a1P4Z N5aWgRLwQr6MQ65IsQ X-QQ-XMRINFO: NI4Ajvh11aEjEMj13RCX7UuhPEoou2bs1g== From: Edward Adam Davis To: konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Cc: eadavis@qq.com, kartikey406@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, slava@dubeyko.com, syzbot+4b4093b1f24ad789bf37@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: no longer save to shadow map if the num of members is too small Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:16:03 +0800 X-OQ-MSGID: <20260318011602.209709-2-eadavis@qq.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:54:12 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > Are you perhaps confusing the regular inode's GC cache (gc inode) with > the DAT's shadow mapping inode? My fault.