From: "Ziyou Wang (Lenovo)" <ziyou.dev@foxmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Ziyou Wang (Lenovo)" <ziyou.dev@foxmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI/DPC: Increase recovery timeout to 60 seconds
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 16:56:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_BB887B4DB8D2131AF5026893E0FE567D6D05@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106082612.1840817-1-ziyou.dev@foxmail.com>
Some NVMe devices need more than 5 seconds to recover after DPC
containment, but pci_dpc_recovered() waits only 4 seconds. If the device
hasn't recovered by then, pciehp reports "device recovery failed" and
the device is re-enumerated.
Move PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS definition from pci.c to pci.h so it can be
used in dpc.c. Use PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS (60 seconds) as the timeout
so pciehp waits as long as pci_dev_wait() does, which is sufficient for
all known devices.
Tested with INNOGRIT NVMe SSD [1dbe:5668] with ACS Fatal error
injection:
Upstream kernel (7.3.0-master+, 4s timeout):
[123.018691] nvme: not ready 1023ms after DPC; waiting
[124.106690] nvme: not ready 2047ms after DPC; waiting
[125.642703] pciehp: Slot(64): Link Down
[126.218696] AER: subordinate device reset failed
[126.218700] AER: device recovery failed
Device re-enumerated as nvme1
With this patch (60s timeout):
[74.894811] nvme: not ready 1023ms after DPC; waiting
[75.982813] nvme: not ready 2047ms after DPC; waiting
[78.094810] nvme: ready 4095ms after DPC
[78.094816] nvme: restart after slot reset
[78.111620] AER: device recovery successful
Device works normally
Fixes: a97396c6eb13 ("PCI: pciehp: Ignore Link Down/Up caused by DPC")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ziyou Wang (Lenovo) <ziyou.dev@foxmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/pci.c | 1 -
drivers/pci/pci.h | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 11 ++++++-----
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 8cc6a89130b5..08f08f25e597 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ struct pci_pme_device {
* limit, but 60 sec ought to be enough for any device to become
* responsive.
*/
-#define PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS 60000 /* msec */
static void pci_dev_d3_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index ba3c3fddddc2..1e8ddcc013ff 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -61,6 +61,16 @@ struct pcie_tlp_log;
*/
#define PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS 100
+/*
+ * Time to wait for a device to become ready after a reset.
+ *
+ * Devices may extend the 1 sec period through Request Retry Status
+ * completions (PCIe r6.0 sec 2.3.1). The spec does not provide an upper
+ * limit, but 60 sec ought to be enough for any device to become
+ * responsive.
+ */
+#define PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS 60000 /* msec */
+
/* Parameters for the waiting for link up routine */
#define PCIE_LINK_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES 10
#define PCIE_LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS 90
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
index 2b779bd1d861..df1c469fa24c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
@@ -116,12 +116,13 @@ bool pci_dpc_recovered(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return false;
/*
- * Need a timeout in case DPC never completes due to failure of
- * dpc_wait_rp_inactive(). The spec doesn't mandate a time limit,
- * but reports indicate that DPC completes within 4 seconds.
+ * Wait for DPC recovery completion. Use PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS
+ * (60s) to match pci_dev_wait() timeout. Some devices need >5 seconds
+ * to recover after DPC containment. The 4 second timeout is too short.
*/
- wait_event_timeout(dpc_completed_waitqueue, dpc_completed(pdev),
- msecs_to_jiffies(4000));
+ wait_event_timeout(dpc_completed_waitqueue,
+ dpc_completed(pdev),
+ msecs_to_jiffies(PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS));
return test_and_clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags);
}
--
2.53.0
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261106082612.1840817-1-ziyou.dev@foxmail.com>
2026-11-06 8:56 ` Ziyou Wang (Lenovo) [this message]
2026-11-06 15:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_BB887B4DB8D2131AF5026893E0FE567D6D05@qq.com \
--to=ziyou.dev@foxmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®