From: Hang Nan <2122295973@qq.com>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
matttbe@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com,
willemb@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, 2122295973@qq.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: mptcp: take token lookup references with acquire ordering
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 21:09:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_D60B0B7B6362D7A729A4FEAFFDF4D8328107@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179448794830.196117.14284634941387773647@qq.com>
Thanks. All four points are correct; respun as v3 with two additional
patches. Details below.
[High] token 0 accepted by mptcp_token_get_sock()
Agreed, and it is a real defect rather than a consequence of the missing
ordering. Both validations compare the socket's token with the requested
one, and for a requested token of 0 that comparison is satisfied by
exactly the states a socket must not be accepted in: the value
mptcp_token_destroy() stores, and the zeroed state of a newly allocated
msk. The ordering change does not help there, because the comparison
itself is vacuous.
What I verified statically before sending v3:
- mptcp_parse_option() copies the MP_JOIN SYN token with
get_unaligned_be32() and does not reject 0;
- subflow_token_join_request() passes the result straight to
mptcp_pm_get_local_id(), and for a subflow with a different source
port to mptcp_pm_announced_has_ssk(), which walks
msk->pm.anno_list under msk->pm.lock;
- that list is initialised from mptcp_pm_data_init(), i.e. well after
a socket can be found on a chain.
Patch 3 now rejects token 0 before walking the chain. I did not manage
to reproduce the resulting crash, so I am not claiming to have observed
it: the description in the patch is a static argument, and the Fixes: tag
points at the commit that introduced the lookup, not at an observed
failure.
[High] mptcp_token_iter_next() re-checks only net_eq()
Agreed. Patch 4 re-reads the token after the acquisition and drops the
socket unless it is non-zero and still hashes to the slot being walked.
A socket on a chain always hashes to that slot, so the check only rejects
objects whose memory has been reused in the meantime. I kept the
severity assessment lower than the one above because both consumers
(mptcp_diag, the userspace path manager) are netlink paths that require
privileges in the target network namespace, so the bad state is reached
locally rather than from the wire.
[Medium] the commit message gives the wrong reason
Agreed, and the correction is in patch 1. The acquire does not pair with
anything in mptcp_token_destroy(): that function does not touch
sk_refcnt. What it pairs with is the publication in
sock_init_data_uid(), smp_wmb() followed by refcount_set(&sk->sk_refcnt,
1), in the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU reuse window, which is the case
refcount.h documents. The message now says that, and keeps the teardown
comment only as background for what the re-check is looking at.
[Low] Fixes: trailer
Agreed, and corrected in v2 (now v3): 2c5ebd001d4f and 96d890daad05 for
the two mptcp sites, and 1cd62c21572c for the reuseport patch, whose site
also postdates the consolidation.
On testing: the ordering change itself has no runtime observable on
x86-64 (both variants compile to lock cmpxchg) and we have no way to
observe the reordering on the hardware at hand, so patches 1 and 2 carry
an instruction-level argument only (on arm64 the CAS becomes CASA; I can
include the disassembly if useful). Patches 3 and 4 are plain
functional checks and both objects build; I have not run a KUnit case
for token 0 yet.
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261112124547.193812-1-2122295973@qq.com>
2026-11-12 12:45 ` Hang Nan
2026-11-12 12:50 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-13 13:05 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-12 12:45 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: core: take the reuseport migration reference " Hang Nan
2026-11-13 13:05 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
[not found] ` <20261112124547.193812-2-2122295973@qq.com>
2026-11-12 12:52 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: mptcp: take token lookup references " Hang Nan
[not found] ` <179448794830.196117.14284634941387773647@qq.com>
2026-11-13 8:44 ` [PATCH net 0/2] net: restore acquire ordering for two remaining Hang Nan
2026-11-14 13:09 ` Hang Nan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_D60B0B7B6362D7A729A4FEAFFDF4D8328107@qq.com \
--to=2122295973@qq.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®