From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de
Subject: [tip:x86/alternatives] x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 03:59:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-093ae8f9a86a974c920b613860f1f7fd5bbd70ab@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119184556.11479-1-bp@alien8.de>
Commit-ID: 093ae8f9a86a974c920b613860f1f7fd5bbd70ab
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/093ae8f9a86a974c920b613860f1f7fd5bbd70ab
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:11:36 +0200
Committer: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 12:43:08 +0100
x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP
Currently, the kernel uses
[LM]FENCE; RDTSC
in the timekeeping code, to guarantee monotonicity of time where the
*FENCE is selected based on vendor.
Replace that sequence with RDTSCP which is faster or on-par and gives
the same guarantees.
A microbenchmark on Intel shows that the change is on-par.
On AMD, the change is either on-par with the current LFENCE-prefixed
RDTSC or slightly better with RDTSCP.
The comparison is done with the LFENCE-prefixed RDTSC (and not with the
MFENCE-prefixed one, as one would normally expect) because all modern
AMD families make LFENCE serializing and thus avoid the heavy MFENCE by
effectively enabling X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC.
Co-developed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181119184556.11479-1-bp@alien8.de
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 91e4cf189914..5cc3930cb465 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc(void)
*/
static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc_ordered(void)
{
+ DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
/*
* The RDTSC instruction is not ordered relative to memory
* access. The Intel SDM and the AMD APM are both vague on this
@@ -227,9 +229,19 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc_ordered(void)
* ordering guarantees as reading from a global memory location
* that some other imaginary CPU is updating continuously with a
* time stamp.
+ *
+ * Thus, use the preferred barrier on the respective CPU, aiming for
+ * RDTSCP as the default.
*/
- barrier_nospec();
- return rdtsc();
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_3("rdtsc",
+ "mfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC,
+ "lfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC,
+ "rdtscp", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)
+ : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
+ /* RDTSCP clobbers ECX with MSR_TSC_AUX. */
+ :: "ecx");
+
+ return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
}
static inline unsigned long long native_read_pmc(int counter)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-19 18:45 [PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19 19:02 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2018-11-19 19:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-11-19 20:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19 20:48 ` hpa
2018-11-20 9:11 ` [tip:x86/timers] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-11-23 20:03 ` [PATCH] " Guenter Roeck
2018-11-23 20:22 ` hpa
2018-11-23 20:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-23 20:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-23 21:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-23 21:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-07 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:59 ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-093ae8f9a86a974c920b613860f1f7fd5bbd70ab@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome