From: tip-bot for Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
yinghai@kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com,
tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/apic-cleanups] x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:48:55 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-0aa002fe602939370e9476e5ec32b562000a0425@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D00B3B9.7060702@kernel.org>
Commit-ID: 0aa002fe602939370e9476e5ec32b562000a0425
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0aa002fe602939370e9476e5ec32b562000a0425
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:47:21 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:46:26 +0100
x86: apic: Cleanup and simplify setup_local_APIC()
setup_local_APIC() is used to setup local APIC early during CPU
initialization and already assumes that preemption is disabled on
entry. However, The function unnecessarily disables and enables
preemption and uses smp_processor_id() multiple times in and out of
the nested preemption disabled section. This gives the wrong
impression that the function might be able to handle being called with
preemption enabled and/or migrated to another processor in the middle.
Make it clear that the function is always called with preemption
disabled, drop the confusing preemption disable block and call
smp_processor_id() once at the beginning of the function.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: brgerst@gmail.com
LKML-Reference: <4D00B3B9.7060702@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index 8933936..c0f6426 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -1195,12 +1195,15 @@ static void __cpuinit lapic_setup_esr(void)
oldvalue, value);
}
-
/**
* setup_local_APIC - setup the local APIC
+ *
+ * Used to setup local APIC while initializing BSP or bringin up APs.
+ * Always called with preemption disabled.
*/
void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned int value, queued;
int i, j, acked = 0;
unsigned long long tsc = 0, ntsc;
@@ -1225,8 +1228,6 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
#endif
perf_events_lapic_init();
- preempt_disable();
-
/*
* Double-check whether this APIC is really registered.
* This is meaningless in clustered apic mode, so we skip it.
@@ -1342,21 +1343,19 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
* TODO: set up through-local-APIC from through-I/O-APIC? --macro
*/
value = apic_read(APIC_LVT0) & APIC_LVT_MASKED;
- if (!smp_processor_id() && (pic_mode || !value)) {
+ if (!cpu && (pic_mode || !value)) {
value = APIC_DM_EXTINT;
- apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "enabled ExtINT on CPU#%d\n",
- smp_processor_id());
+ apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "enabled ExtINT on CPU#%d\n", cpu);
} else {
value = APIC_DM_EXTINT | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
- apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "masked ExtINT on CPU#%d\n",
- smp_processor_id());
+ apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "masked ExtINT on CPU#%d\n", cpu);
}
apic_write(APIC_LVT0, value);
/*
* only the BP should see the LINT1 NMI signal, obviously.
*/
- if (!smp_processor_id())
+ if (!cpu)
value = APIC_DM_NMI;
else
value = APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
@@ -1364,11 +1363,9 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
value |= APIC_LVT_LEVEL_TRIGGER;
apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
- preempt_enable();
-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
/* Recheck CMCI information after local APIC is up on CPU #0 */
- if (smp_processor_id() == 0)
+ if (!cpu)
cmci_recheck();
#endif
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-10 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 15:21 [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 01/16] x86: Kill unused static boot_cpu_logical_apicid in smpboot.c Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 02/16] x86: Rename x86_32 MAX_APICID to MAX_LOCAL_APIC Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 03/16] x86: Make default_send_IPI_mask_sequence/allbutself_logical() 32bit only Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 04/16] x86: Use local variable to cache smp_processor_id() in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 21:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-30 16:17 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-11-30 18:11 ` [PATCH UPDATED#2 " Tejun Heo
2010-11-30 18:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-30 19:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-30 20:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-09 9:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-12-09 10:47 ` [PATCH UPDATED#3 04/16] x86: setup_local_APIC() must always be called with preemption disabled Tejun Heo
2010-12-09 16:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-09 16:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-12-09 21:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 11:09 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 12:48 ` tip-bot for Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 05/16] x86: Replace cpu_2_logical_apicid[] with early percpu variable Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 06/16] x86: Always use x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid for cpu -> logical apic id Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 07/16] x86: Remove custom apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() implementations Tejun Heo
2010-12-09 21:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 11:12 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 11:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 08/16] x86: Use apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() to find out logical apic id mapping early during boot Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 09/16] x86: Implement cpu_to_logical_apicid() for bigsmp_32 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:21 ` [PATCH 10/16] x86: Implement cpu_to_logical_apicid() for summit_32 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/16] x86: Implement cpu_to_logical_apicid() for numaq_32 Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 12/16] x86: Replace apic->apicid_to_node() with ->numa_cpu_node() Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-12-09 21:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 20:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 20:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-10 21:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86: Unify CPU -> " Tejun Heo
2010-12-09 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-10 11:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/16] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling " Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 16/16] x86: Unify NUMA initialization " Tejun Heo
2010-12-07 16:22 ` [PATCHSET] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths, take#2 Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-0aa002fe602939370e9476e5ec32b562000a0425@git.kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome