From: tip-bot for Tetsuo Handa <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, mingo@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Use for_each_process_thread() for debug_show_all_locks()
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 00:53:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-0f736a52e4be86476eec1d5adbcbd9c2809ac4b4@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523011279-8206-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Commit-ID: 0f736a52e4be86476eec1d5adbcbd9c2809ac4b4
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0f736a52e4be86476eec1d5adbcbd9c2809ac4b4
Author: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
AuthorDate: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:41:18 +0900
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 09:15:02 +0200
locking/lockdep: Use for_each_process_thread() for debug_show_all_locks()
debug_show_all_locks() tries to grab the tasklist_lock for two seconds, but
calling while_each_thread() without tasklist_lock held is not safe.
See the following commit for more information:
4449a51a7c281602 ("vm_is_stack: use for_each_thread() rather then buggy while_each_thread()")
Change debug_show_all_locks() from "do_each_thread()/while_each_thread()
with possibility of missing tasklist_lock" to "for_each_process_thread()
with RCU", and add a call to touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs() like
show_state_filter() does.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1523011279-8206-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 43 ++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 023386338269..94f4d21ff66d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4451,8 +4451,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_check_no_locks_held);
void debug_show_all_locks(void)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
- int count = 10;
- int unlock = 1;
if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) {
pr_warn("INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n");
@@ -4460,30 +4458,8 @@ void debug_show_all_locks(void)
}
pr_warn("\nShowing all locks held in the system:\n");
- /*
- * Here we try to get the tasklist_lock as hard as possible,
- * if not successful after 2 seconds we ignore it (but keep
- * trying). This is to enable a debug printout even if a
- * tasklist_lock-holding task deadlocks or crashes.
- */
-retry:
- if (!read_trylock(&tasklist_lock)) {
- if (count == 10)
- pr_warn("hm, tasklist_lock locked, retrying... ");
- if (count) {
- count--;
- pr_cont(" #%d", 10-count);
- mdelay(200);
- goto retry;
- }
- pr_cont(" ignoring it.\n");
- unlock = 0;
- } else {
- if (count != 10)
- pr_cont(" locked it.\n");
- }
-
- do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
/*
* It's not reliable to print a task's held locks
* if it's not sleeping (or if it's not the current
@@ -4491,19 +4467,16 @@ retry:
*/
if (p->state == TASK_RUNNING && p != current)
continue;
- if (p->lockdep_depth)
- lockdep_print_held_locks(p);
- if (!unlock)
- if (read_trylock(&tasklist_lock))
- unlock = 1;
+ if (!p->lockdep_depth)
+ continue;
+ lockdep_print_held_locks(p);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
- } while_each_thread(g, p);
+ touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs();
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
pr_warn("\n");
pr_warn("=============================================\n\n");
-
- if (unlock)
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_show_all_locks);
#endif
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-06 10:41 [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: " Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-06 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Move sanity check to inside lockdep_print_held_locks() Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-14 7:54 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-14 7:53 ` tip-bot for Tetsuo Handa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-0f736a52e4be86476eec1d5adbcbd9c2809ac4b4@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome