mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Waiman Long <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	davej@redhat.com, Waiman.Long@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	scott.norton@hp.com
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/rwlock, x86: Clean up asm/ spinlock*.h to remove old rwlock code
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:31:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-2ff810a7ef38b55ba6c7b80bb7ff22847fd3be69@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408037251-45918-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>

Commit-ID:  2ff810a7ef38b55ba6c7b80bb7ff22847fd3be69
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/2ff810a7ef38b55ba6c7b80bb7ff22847fd3be69
Author:     Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:27:30 -0400
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:46:38 +0200

locking/rwlock, x86: Clean up asm/spinlock*.h to remove old rwlock code

As the x86 architecture now uses qrwlock for its read/write lock
implementation, it is no longer necessary to keep the old rwlock code
around. This patch removes the old rwlock code in the asm/spinlock.h
and asm/spinlock_types.h files. Now the ARCH_USE_QUEUE_RWLOCK
config parameter cannot be removed from x86/Kconfig or there will be
a compilation error.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408037251-45918-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h       | 81 +----------------------------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h |  4 --
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 54f1c80..9295016 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 		cpu_relax();
 }
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_QUEUE_RWLOCK
 /*
  * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
  * but only one writer.
@@ -198,91 +197,15 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
  * irq-safe write-lock, but readers can get non-irqsafe
  * read-locks.
  *
- * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
- * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
+ * On x86, we implement read-write locks using the generic qrwlock with
+ * x86 specific optimization.
  */
 
-/**
- * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
- * @lock: the rwlock in question.
- */
-static inline int arch_read_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
-	return lock->lock > 0;
-}
-
-/**
- * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
- * @lock: the rwlock in question.
- */
-static inline int arch_write_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
-	return lock->write == WRITE_LOCK_CMP;
-}
-
-static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX READ_LOCK_SIZE(dec) " (%0)\n\t"
-		     "jns 1f\n"
-		     "call __read_lock_failed\n\t"
-		     "1:\n"
-		     ::LOCK_PTR_REG (rw) : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX WRITE_LOCK_SUB(%1) "(%0)\n\t"
-		     "jz 1f\n"
-		     "call __write_lock_failed\n\t"
-		     "1:\n"
-		     ::LOCK_PTR_REG (&rw->write), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS)
-		     : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
-	READ_LOCK_ATOMIC(t) *count = (READ_LOCK_ATOMIC(t) *)lock;
-
-	if (READ_LOCK_ATOMIC(dec_return)(count) >= 0)
-		return 1;
-	READ_LOCK_ATOMIC(inc)(count);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
-	atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)&lock->write;
-
-	if (atomic_sub_and_test(WRITE_LOCK_CMP, count))
-		return 1;
-	atomic_add(WRITE_LOCK_CMP, count);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX READ_LOCK_SIZE(inc) " %0"
-		     :"+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX WRITE_LOCK_ADD(%1) "%0"
-		     : "+m" (rw->write) : "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
-}
-#else
 #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
-#endif /* CONFIG_QUEUE_RWLOCK */
 
 #define arch_read_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_read_lock(lock)
 #define arch_write_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_write_lock(lock)
 
-#undef READ_LOCK_SIZE
-#undef READ_LOCK_ATOMIC
-#undef WRITE_LOCK_ADD
-#undef WRITE_LOCK_SUB
-#undef WRITE_LOCK_CMP
-
 #define arch_spin_relax(lock)	cpu_relax()
 #define arch_read_relax(lock)	cpu_relax()
 #define arch_write_relax(lock)	cpu_relax()
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
index 73c4c00..5f9d757 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
@@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ typedef struct arch_spinlock {
 
 #define __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED	{ { 0 } }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_RWLOCK
 #include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
-#else
-#include <asm/rwlock.h>
-#endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H */

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-10 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14 17:27 [PATCH 0/2] rwlock, x86: remove unused " Waiman Long
2014-08-14 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] rwlock, x86: clean up asm/spinlock*.h to remove old " Waiman Long
2014-09-10 17:31   ` tip-bot for Waiman Long [this message]
2014-08-14 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] rwlock, x86: delete unused asm/rwlock.h and rwlock.S Waiman Long
2014-09-10 17:32   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/rwlock, x86: Delete unused asm/ rwlock.h " tip-bot for Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-2ff810a7ef38b55ba6c7b80bb7ff22847fd3be69@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome