From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rq->nr_uninterruptible update race
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:25:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-4ca9b72b71f10147bd21969c1805f5b2c4ca7b7b@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327486224.2614.45.camel@laptop>
Commit-ID: 4ca9b72b71f10147bd21969c1805f5b2c4ca7b7b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4ca9b72b71f10147bd21969c1805f5b2c4ca7b7b
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:50:51 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:38:09 +0100
sched: Fix rq->nr_uninterruptible update race
KOSAKI Motohiro noticed the following race:
> CPU0 CPU1
> --------------------------------------------------------
> deactivate_task()
> task->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> activate_task()
> rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
>
> schedule()
> deactivate_task()
> rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
>
Kosaki-San's scenario is possible when CPU0 runs
__sched_setscheduler() against CPU1's current @task.
__sched_setscheduler() does a dequeue/enqueue in order to move
the task to its new queue (position) to reflect the newly provided
scheduling parameters. However it should be completely invariant to
nr_uninterruptible accounting, sched_setscheduler() doesn't affect
readyness to run, merely policy on when to run.
So convert the inappropriate activate/deactivate_task usage to
enqueue/dequeue_task, which avoids the nr_uninterruptible accounting.
Also convert the two other sites: __migrate_task() and
normalize_task() that still use activate/deactivate_task. These sites
aren't really a problem since __migrate_task() will only be called on
non-running task (and therefore are immume to the described problem)
and normalize_task() isn't ever used on regular systems.
Also remove the comments from activate/deactivate_task since they're
misleading at best.
Reported-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1327486224.2614.45.camel@laptop
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index df00cb0..e067df1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -723,9 +723,6 @@ static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
}
-/*
- * activate_task - move a task to the runqueue.
- */
void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
@@ -734,9 +731,6 @@ void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
}
-/*
- * deactivate_task - remove a task from the runqueue.
- */
void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
@@ -4134,7 +4128,7 @@ recheck:
on_rq = p->on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
- deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
if (running)
p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -4147,7 +4141,7 @@ recheck:
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
if (on_rq)
- activate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
@@ -4998,9 +4992,9 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu)
* placed properly.
*/
if (p->on_rq) {
- deactivate_task(rq_src, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq_src, p, 0);
set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu);
- activate_task(rq_dest, p, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq_dest, p, 0);
check_preempt_curr(rq_dest, p, 0);
}
done:
@@ -7032,10 +7026,10 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
on_rq = p->on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
__setscheduler(rq, p, SCHED_NORMAL, 0);
if (on_rq) {
- activate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, 0);
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-22 0:42 [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition Yasunori Goto
2011-12-22 2:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-22 8:22 ` Yasunori Goto
2011-12-22 20:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-23 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-23 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-26 8:23 ` Yasunori Goto
2011-12-26 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-27 6:48 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-06 10:22 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-06 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-06 12:01 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-06 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-06 14:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-06 14:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-07 1:31 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-16 11:51 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-16 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-17 8:40 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-17 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-17 15:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-18 14:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-24 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 17:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-25 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-25 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-25 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-26 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-27 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-28 12:03 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix ancient race in do_exit() tip-bot for Yasunori Goto
2012-01-28 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-29 16:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-29 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-29 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-29 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-30 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-06 13:48 ` [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-28 21:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-24 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 18:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-25 6:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-26 21:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-25 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 20:25 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-01-27 5:20 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rq->nr_uninterruptible update race Rakib Mullick
2012-01-27 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 14:11 ` Rakib Mullick
2012-01-26 21:21 ` [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-27 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-26 6:52 ` Yasunori Goto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-4ca9b72b71f10147bd21969c1805f5b2c4ca7b7b@git.kernel.org \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome