From: tip-bot for Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, garyhade@us.ibm.com, jbeulich@novell.com,
JBeulich@novell.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/irq] x86: Eliminate pointless adjustment attempts in fixup_irqs()
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:40:54 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-58bff947e2d164c7e5cbf7f485e4b3d4884befeb@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5D52C2020000780003272C@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Commit-ID: 58bff947e2d164c7e5cbf7f485e4b3d4884befeb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/58bff947e2d164c7e5cbf7f485e4b3d4884befeb
Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:54:26 +0000
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:58:00 +0100
x86: Eliminate pointless adjustment attempts in fixup_irqs()
Not only when an IRQ's affinity equals cpu_online_mask is there
no need to actually try to adjust the affinity, but also when
it's a subset thereof. This particularly avoids adjustment
attempts during system shutdown to any IRQs bound to CPU#0.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D5D52C2020000780003272C@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 387b6a0..78793ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
data = &desc->irq_data;
affinity = data->affinity;
if (!irq_has_action(irq) ||
- cpumask_equal(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
+ cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
continue;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-18 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-17 15:54 [PATCH, resend #2] x86: eliminate " Jan Beulich
2011-02-18 10:40 ` tip-bot for Jan Beulich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-58bff947e2d164c7e5cbf7f485e4b3d4884befeb@git.kernel.org \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome