From: tip-bot for Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, romulo.deoliveira@ufsc.br,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bristot@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Make sure the replenishment timer fires in the next period
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:15:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-5ac69d37784b237707a7b15d199cdb6c6fdb6780@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac50d89887c25285b47465638354b63362f8adff.1488392936.git.bristot@redhat.com>
Commit-ID: 5ac69d37784b237707a7b15d199cdb6c6fdb6780
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5ac69d37784b237707a7b15d199cdb6c6fdb6780
Author: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:10:57 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:37:37 +0100
sched/deadline: Make sure the replenishment timer fires in the next period
Currently, the replenishment timer is set to fire at the deadline
of a task. Although that works for implicit deadline tasks because the
deadline is equals to the begin of the next period, that is not correct
for constrained deadline tasks (deadline < period).
For instance:
f.c:
--------------- %< ---------------
int main (void)
{
for(;;);
}
--------------- >% ---------------
# gcc -o f f.c
# trace-cmd record -e sched:sched_switch \
-e syscalls:sys_exit_sched_setattr \
chrt -d --sched-runtime 490000000 \
--sched-deadline 500000000 \
--sched-period 1000000000 0 ./f
# trace-cmd report | grep "{pid of ./f}"
After setting parameters, the task is replenished and continue running
until being throttled:
f-11295 [003] 13322.113776: sys_exit_sched_setattr: 0x0
The task is throttled after running 492318 ms, as expected:
f-11295 [003] 13322.606094: sched_switch: f:11295 [-1] R ==> watchdog/3:32 [0]
But then, the task is replenished 500719 ms after the first
replenishment:
<idle>-0 [003] 13322.614495: sched_switch: swapper/3:0 [120] R ==> f:11295 [-1]
Running for 490277 ms:
f-11295 [003] 13323.104772: sched_switch: f:11295 [-1] R ==> swapper/3:0 [120]
Hence, in the first period, the task runs 2 * runtime, and that is a bug.
During the first replenishment, the next deadline is set one period away.
So the runtime / period starts to be respected. However, as the second
replenishment took place in the wrong instant, the next replenishment
will also be held in a wrong instant of time. Rather than occurring in
the nth period away from the first activation, it is taking place
in the (nth period - relative deadline).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@ufsc.br>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ac50d89887c25285b47465638354b63362f8adff.1488392936.git.bristot@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index c6db3fd..445e278 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -505,10 +505,15 @@ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
}
}
+static inline u64 dl_next_period(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+ return dl_se->deadline - dl_se->dl_deadline + dl_se->dl_period;
+}
+
/*
* If the entity depleted all its runtime, and if we want it to sleep
* while waiting for some new execution time to become available, we
- * set the bandwidth enforcement timer to the replenishment instant
+ * set the bandwidth replenishment timer to the replenishment instant
* and try to activate it.
*
* Notice that it is important for the caller to know if the timer
@@ -530,7 +535,7 @@ static int start_dl_timer(struct task_struct *p)
* that it is actually coming from rq->clock and not from
* hrtimer's time base reading.
*/
- act = ns_to_ktime(dl_se->deadline);
+ act = ns_to_ktime(dl_next_period(dl_se));
now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
delta = ktime_to_ns(now) - rq_clock(rq);
act = ktime_add_ns(act, delta);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 14:10 [PATCH V4 0/3] sched/deadline: Fixes for constrained deadline tasks Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-03-02 14:10 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] sched/deadline: Replenishment timer should fire in the next period Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-03-07 7:51 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-16 11:15 ` tip-bot for Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [this message]
2017-03-02 14:10 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-03-06 15:51 ` Luca Abeni
2017-03-07 7:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-16 11:15 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-03-02 14:10 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-03-07 7:53 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-16 11:16 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2017-03-15 16:18 ` [PATCH V4 0/3] sched/deadline: Fixes for constrained deadline tasks Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-5ac69d37784b237707a7b15d199cdb6c6fdb6780@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=romulo.deoliveira@ufsc.br \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome