mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	acme@ghostprotocols.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:32 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl>

Commit-ID:  5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:16:32 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:21:36 +0100

perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events

Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about
the same factor as his cpu-count.

This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to
respect the event->cpu filter.

Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/perf_event.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 8ab8698..03cc061 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,9 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 		if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
 			continue;
 
+		if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+			continue;
+
 		hwc = &event->hw;
 
 		interrupts = hwc->interrupts;
@@ -3265,6 +3268,9 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struct perf_event *event,
 
 static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+		return 0;
+
 	if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap || event->attr.task)
 		return 1;
 
@@ -3290,12 +3296,11 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
 	perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
-	put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
 	if (!ctx)
 		ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp);
 	if (ctx)
 		perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
+	put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -3372,6 +3377,9 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struct perf_event *event,
 
 static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+		return 0;
+
 	if (event->attr.comm)
 		return 1;
 
@@ -3408,15 +3416,10 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
 	perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
-	put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
-	/*
-	 * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
-	 * events ends up in.
-	 */
 	ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
 	if (ctx)
 		perf_event_comm_ctx(ctx, comm_event);
+	put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -3491,6 +3494,9 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struct perf_event *event,
 static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
 				   struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
 {
+	if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+		return 0;
+
 	if (event->attr.mmap)
 		return 1;
 
@@ -3564,15 +3570,10 @@ got_name:
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
 	perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event);
-	put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
-	/*
-	 * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
-	 * events ends up in.
-	 */
 	ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
 	if (ctx)
 		perf_event_mmap_ctx(ctx, mmap_event);
+	put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	kfree(buf);
@@ -3863,6 +3864,9 @@ static int perf_swevent_match(struct perf_event *event,
 				struct perf_sample_data *data,
 				struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!perf_swevent_is_counting(event))
 		return 0;
 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-17 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-17 12:16 [PATCH 0/6] a perf and some sched patches Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR near the TASK_state bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:30   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Add missing state chars to TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Update task_state_arraypwith new states Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Assert task state bits at build time Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Fix broken assertion Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:30   ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] a perf and some sched patches Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac@git.kernel.org \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome