mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot for J. R. Okajima" <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	hooanon05g@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Add new check to lock_downgrade()
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:25:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-6419c4af777a773a45a1b1af735de0fcd9a7dcc7@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486053497-9948-3-git-send-email-hooanon05g@gmail.com>

Commit-ID:  6419c4af777a773a45a1b1af735de0fcd9a7dcc7
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/6419c4af777a773a45a1b1af735de0fcd9a7dcc7
Author:     J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 01:38:17 +0900
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:57:07 +0100

locking/lockdep: Add new check to lock_downgrade()

Commit:

  f8319483f57f ("locking/lockdep: Provide a type check for lock_is_held")

didn't fully cover rwsems as downgrade_write() was left out.

Introduce lock_downgrade() and use it to add new checks.

See-also: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148581164003149&w=2
Originally-written-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486053497-9948-3-git-send-email-hooanon05g@gmail.com
[ Rewrote the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |  3 +++
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/locking/rwsem.c   |  6 ++----
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 1e327bb..fffe49f 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -361,6 +361,8 @@ static inline void lock_set_subclass(struct lockdep_map *lock,
 	lock_set_class(lock, lock->name, lock->key, subclass, ip);
 }
 
+extern void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip);
+
 extern void lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_t gfp_mask);
 extern void lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state(void);
 extern void lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t mask);
@@ -411,6 +413,7 @@ static inline void lockdep_on(void)
 
 # define lock_acquire(l, s, t, r, c, n, i)	do { } while (0)
 # define lock_release(l, n, i)			do { } while (0)
+# define lock_downgrade(l, i)			do { } while (0)
 # define lock_set_class(l, n, k, s, i)		do { } while (0)
 # define lock_set_subclass(l, s, i)		do { } while (0)
 # define lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(g)	do { } while (0)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index da79548..b1a1cef 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3533,6 +3533,44 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
+{
+	struct task_struct *curr = current;
+	struct held_lock *hlock;
+	unsigned int depth;
+	int i;
+
+	depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+	/*
+	 * This function is about (re)setting the class of a held lock,
+	 * yet we're not actually holding any locks. Naughty user!
+	 */
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
+		return 0;
+
+	hlock = find_held_lock(curr, lock, depth, &i);
+	if (!hlock)
+		return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
+
+	curr->lockdep_depth = i;
+	curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
+
+	WARN(hlock->read, "downgrading a read lock");
+	hlock->read = 1;
+	hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
+
+	if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * I took it apart and put it back together again, except now I have
+	 * these 'spare' parts.. where shall I put them.
+	 */
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth))
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
+}
+
 /*
  * Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
  * called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
@@ -3759,6 +3797,23 @@ void lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_set_class);
 
+void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
+		return;
+
+	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	check_flags(flags);
+	if (__lock_downgrade(lock, ip))
+		check_chain_key(current);
+	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_downgrade);
+
 /*
  * We are not always called with irqs disabled - do that here,
  * and also avoid lockdep recursion:
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 90a74cc..4d48b1c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -124,10 +124,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(up_write);
  */
 void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-	/*
-	 * lockdep: a downgraded write will live on as a write
-	 * dependency.
-	 */
+	lock_downgrade(&sem->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+
 	rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
 	__downgrade_write(sem);
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-30 21:25 Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() J. R. Okajima
2017-01-30 21:30 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-31 10:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-31 11:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-31 14:23       ` Waiman Long
2017-01-31 14:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-31 15:40   ` J. R. Okajima
2017-01-31 16:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-02 16:33       ` J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 16:38       ` [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: consolidate by new find_held_lock() J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 16:38         ` [PATCH 2/3] lockdep: consolidate by new validate_held_lock() J. R. Okajima
2017-02-14 12:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 11:25           ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Factor out the validate_held_lock() helper function tip-bot for J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 16:38         ` [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: new annotation lock_downgrade() J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 17:59           ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-02 18:45             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-02 21:05               ` J. R. Okajima
2017-02-14 12:11                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 11:25           ` tip-bot for J. R. Okajima [this message]
2017-03-16 11:24         ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Factor out the find_held_lock() helper function tip-bot for J. R. Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-6419c4af777a773a45a1b1af735de0fcd9a7dcc7@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hooanon05g@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome