From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/pti] x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 01:25:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228102846.13447-2-bp@alien8.de>
Commit-ID: 854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:40 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:19:25 +0100
x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx
It is a useless remnant from earlier times. Use the ucode_state enum
directly.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-2-bp@alien8.de
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index aa1b9a422f2b..63370651e376 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -373,26 +373,23 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu)
return ret;
}
-struct apply_microcode_ctx {
- enum ucode_state err;
-};
-
static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg)
{
- struct apply_microcode_ctx *ctx = arg;
+ enum ucode_state *err = arg;
- ctx->err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id());
+ *err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id());
}
static int apply_microcode_on_target(int cpu)
{
- struct apply_microcode_ctx ctx = { .err = 0 };
+ enum ucode_state err;
int ret;
- ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &ctx, 1);
- if (!ret)
- ret = ctx.err;
-
+ ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &err, 1);
+ if (!ret) {
+ if (err == UCODE_ERROR)
+ ret = 1;
+ }
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 10:28 [PATCH 0/7] x86/microcode: Improve late loading Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/microcode: Get rid of struct apply_microcode_ctx Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 9:25 ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 9:25 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ashok Raj
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 9:26 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ashok Raj
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/microcode: Do not upload microcode if CPUs are offline Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 13:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2018-02-28 13:26 ` Raj, Ashok
2018-02-28 19:07 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2018-03-05 22:06 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-03-08 9:26 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ashok Raj
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 9:27 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/microcode: Request microcode on the BSP Borislav Petkov
2018-03-05 22:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-03-08 9:27 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 13:59 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2018-02-28 14:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-28 17:48 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2018-03-05 22:09 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-03-08 9:28 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ashok Raj
2018-03-05 22:12 ` [PATCH 0/7] x86/microcode: Improve late loading Tom Lendacky
2018-03-05 23:51 ` Raj, Ashok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-854857f5944c59a881ff607b37ed9ed41d031a3b@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®