mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, duyuyang@gmail.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:46:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-886532aee3cd42d95196601ed16d7c3d4679e9e5@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617124718.1232976-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Commit-ID:  886532aee3cd42d95196601ed16d7c3d4679e9e5
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/886532aee3cd42d95196601ed16d7c3d4679e9e5
Author:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:47:05 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:17:07 +0200

locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING

The last cleanup patch triggered another issue, as now another function
should be moved into the same section:

 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3580:12: error: 'mark_lock' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
  static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,

Move mark_lock() into the same #ifdef section as its only caller, and
remove the now-unused mark_lock_irq() stub helper.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Fixes: 0d2cc3b34532 ("locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190617124718.1232976-1-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 5e368f485330..341f52117f88 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -437,13 +437,6 @@ static int verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
- * addresses. Protected by the graph_lock.
- */
-unsigned long nr_stack_trace_entries;
-static unsigned long stack_trace[MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES];
-
 static void print_lockdep_off(const char *bug_msg)
 {
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s\n", bug_msg);
@@ -453,6 +446,15 @@ static void print_lockdep_off(const char *bug_msg)
 #endif
 }
 
+unsigned long nr_stack_trace_entries;
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
+/*
+ * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
+ * addresses. Protected by the graph_lock.
+ */
+static unsigned long stack_trace[MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES];
+
 static int save_trace(struct lock_trace *trace)
 {
 	unsigned long *entries = stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries;
@@ -475,6 +477,7 @@ static int save_trace(struct lock_trace *trace)
 
 	return 1;
 }
+#endif
 
 unsigned int nr_hardirq_chains;
 unsigned int nr_softirq_chains;
@@ -488,6 +491,7 @@ unsigned int max_lockdep_depth;
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lockdep_stats, lockdep_stats);
 #endif
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
 /*
  * Locking printouts:
  */
@@ -505,6 +509,7 @@ static const char *usage_str[] =
 #undef LOCKDEP_STATE
 	[LOCK_USED] = "INITIAL USE",
 };
+#endif
 
 const char * __get_key_name(struct lockdep_subclass_key *key, char *str)
 {
@@ -2964,12 +2969,10 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr)
 #endif
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
 static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 		     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit);
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
-
-
 static void print_usage_bug_scenario(struct held_lock *lock)
 {
 	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(lock);
@@ -3545,35 +3548,6 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#else /* defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */
-
-static inline
-int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
-{
-	WARN_ON(1); /* Impossible innit? when we don't have TRACE_IRQFLAG */
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static inline int
-mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
-		struct held_lock *hlock)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-#endif /* defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */
-
 /*
  * Mark a lock with a usage bit, and validate the state transition:
  */
@@ -3634,6 +3608,27 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#else /* defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */
+
+static inline int
+mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
+		struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */
+
 /*
  * Initialize a lock instance's lock-class mapping info:
  */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-25  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 12:47 [PATCH] " Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-24 12:17 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-24 16:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-25  8:46 ` tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-06-25 12:16   ` [tip:locking/core] " Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-886532aee3cd42d95196601ed16d7c3d4679e9e5@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome