mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf_event: Fix event group handling in __perf_event_sched_*()
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:46:58 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-8c9ed8e14c342ec5e7f27e7e498f62409a10eb29@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ABC5A55.7000208@cn.fujitsu.com>

Commit-ID:  8c9ed8e14c342ec5e7f27e7e498f62409a10eb29
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8c9ed8e14c342ec5e7f27e7e498f62409a10eb29
Author:     Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:51:17 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:30:44 +0200

perf_event: Fix event group handling in __perf_event_sched_*()

Paul Mackerras says:

 "Actually, looking at this more closely, it has to be a group
 leader anyway since it's at the top level of ctx->group_list.  In
 fact I see four places where we do:

  list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry) {
	if (event == event->group_leader)
		...

 or the equivalent, three of which appear to have been introduced
 by afedadf2 ("perf_counter: Optimize sched in/out of counters")
 back in May by Peter Z.

 As far as I can see the if () is superfluous in each case (a
 singleton event will be a group of 1 and will have its
 group_leader pointing to itself)."

 [ See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125361238901442&w=2 ]

And Peter Zijlstra points out this is a bugfix:

 "The intent was to call event_sched_{in,out}() for single event
  groups because that's cheaper than group_sched_{in,out}(),
  however..

  - as you noticed, I got the condition wrong, it should have read:

      list_empty(&event->sibling_list)

  - it failed to call group_can_go_on() which deals with ->exclusive.

  - it also doesn't call hw_perf_group_sched_in() which might break
    power."

 [ See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125369523318583&w=2 ]

Changelog v1->v2:

 - Fix the title name according to Peter Zijlstra's suggestion

 - Remove the comments and WARN_ON_ONCE() as Peter Zijlstra's
   suggestion

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <4ABC5A55.7000208@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>


---
 kernel/perf_event.c |   30 ++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 0f86feb..e50543d 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1030,14 +1030,10 @@ void __perf_event_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 	update_context_time(ctx);
 
 	perf_disable();
-	if (ctx->nr_active) {
-		list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry) {
-			if (event != event->group_leader)
-				event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
-			else
-				group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
-		}
-	}
+	if (ctx->nr_active)
+		list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry)
+			group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
+
 	perf_enable();
  out:
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
@@ -1258,12 +1254,8 @@ __perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 		if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		if (event != event->group_leader)
-			event_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu);
-		else {
-			if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, 1))
-				group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu);
-		}
+		if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, 1))
+			group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu);
 
 		/*
 		 * If this pinned group hasn't been scheduled,
@@ -1291,15 +1283,9 @@ __perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 		if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		if (event != event->group_leader) {
-			if (event_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu))
+		if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, can_add_hw))
+			if (group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu))
 				can_add_hw = 0;
-		} else {
-			if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, can_add_hw)) {
-				if (group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu))
-					can_add_hw = 0;
-			}
-		}
 	}
 	perf_enable();
  out:

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-01  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-22  8:47 [PATCH] perf_counter: cleanup for __perf_event_sched_in() Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-22  9:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-22  9:27   ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-22  9:32     ` [PATCH v2] " Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-22  9:39 ` [PATCH] " Paul Mackerras
2009-09-22 11:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-23  2:45   ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-23  3:32     ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-23  8:10       ` [PATCH 1/2] perf_counter: cleanup for __perf_event_sched_*() Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-23  8:13         ` [PATCH 2/2] perf_counter: optimize for perf_event_init_task() Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-23  8:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25  1:23             ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-23  8:40         ` [PATCH 1/2] perf_counter: cleanup for __perf_event_sched_*() Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25  1:22           ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-25  5:51           ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] perf_counter: fix " Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-25  5:54             ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] optimize for perf_event_init_task() Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-25  8:55               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-01  7:31                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01  7:47               ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf_event: Clean up perf_event_init_task() tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
2009-09-25  8:55             ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] perf_counter: fix for __perf_event_sched_*() Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-01  7:46             ` tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2009-09-22 11:12 ` [PATCH] perf_counter: cleanup for __perf_event_sched_in() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-8c9ed8e14c342ec5e7f27e7e498f62409a10eb29@git.kernel.org \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome