mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Rui Wang <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rui.y.wang@intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:29:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-961888b1d76d84efc66a8f5604b06ac12ac2f978@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513586050-1641-1-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com>

Commit-ID:  961888b1d76d84efc66a8f5604b06ac12ac2f978
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/961888b1d76d84efc66a8f5604b06ac12ac2f978
Author:     Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:34:10 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 01:15:52 +0100

selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault

For distributions with old userspace header files, the _sigfault
structure is different. mpx-mini-test fails with the following
error:

  [root@Purley]# mpx-mini-test_64 tabletest
  XSAVE is supported by HW & OS
  XSAVE processor supported state mask: 0x2ff
  XSAVE OS supported state mask: 0x2ff
   BNDREGS: size: 64 user: 1 supervisor: 0 aligned: 0
    BNDCSR: size: 64 user: 1 supervisor: 0 aligned: 0
  starting mpx bounds table test
  ERROR: siginfo bounds do not match shadow bounds for register 0

Fix it by using the correct offset of _lower/_upper in _sigfault.
RHEL needs this patch to work.

Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Fixes: e754aedc26ef ("x86/mpx, selftests: Add MPX self test")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513586050-1641-1-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
index ec0f6b4..9c0325e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -315,11 +315,39 @@ static inline void *__si_bounds_upper(siginfo_t *si)
 	return si->si_upper;
 }
 #else
+
+/*
+ * This deals with old version of _sigfault in some distros:
+ *
+
+old _sigfault:
+        struct {
+            void *si_addr;
+	} _sigfault;
+
+new _sigfault:
+	struct {
+		void __user *_addr;
+		int _trapno;
+		short _addr_lsb;
+		union {
+			struct {
+				void __user *_lower;
+				void __user *_upper;
+			} _addr_bnd;
+			__u32 _pkey;
+		};
+	} _sigfault;
+ *
+ */
+
 static inline void **__si_bounds_hack(siginfo_t *si)
 {
 	void *sigfault = &si->_sifields._sigfault;
 	void *end_sigfault = sigfault + sizeof(si->_sifields._sigfault);
-	void **__si_lower = end_sigfault;
+	int *trapno = (int*)end_sigfault;
+	/* skip _trapno and _addr_lsb */
+	void **__si_lower = (void**)(trapno + 2);
 
 	return __si_lower;
 }
@@ -331,7 +359,7 @@ static inline void *__si_bounds_lower(siginfo_t *si)
 
 static inline void *__si_bounds_upper(siginfo_t *si)
 {
-	return (*__si_bounds_hack(si)) + sizeof(void *);
+	return *(__si_bounds_hack(si) + 1);
 }
 #endif
 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-15  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-18  8:34 [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Fix wrong " Rui Wang
2018-02-13 18:47 ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect " tip-bot for Rui Wang
2018-02-15  0:29 ` tip-bot for Rui Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-961888b1d76d84efc66a8f5604b06ac12ac2f978@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rui.y.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome